Literature DB >> 11180433

Functional MRI of human auditory cortex using block and event-related designs.

T H Le1, S Patel, T P Roberts.   

Abstract

fMRI of human auditory cortex response to sinusoidal tones of 200, 1000, and 3000 Hz was evaluated using block design and conventional and "silent" event-related designs. Conventional event-related fMRI revealed the timecourse of the BOLD response (approximately 5 sec to peak, approximately 4 sec full-width-half-max, and approximately 14 sec recovery to baseline). Both event-related, but not block, designs provided evidence for tonotopic organization in auditory cortex. Sources of low-frequency activation were more lateral and anterior than the sources of high-frequency activation (P < or = 0.05). In the block designs, repeated rapid stimulus presentation and the co-incidence of scanner noise preclude definition of tonotopic organization revealed in event-related approaches. Magn Reson Med 45:254-260, 2001. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11180433     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<254::aid-mrm1034>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  14 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Klaus Mathiak; Alexander Rapp; Tilo T J Kircher; Wolfgang Grodd; Ingo Hertrich; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Werner Lutzenberger; Hermann Ackermann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Optimal design for nonlinear estimation of the hemodynamic response function.

Authors:  Bärbel Maus; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Rainer Goebel; Martijn P F Berger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A neuroimaging study of premotor lateralization and cerebellar involvement in the production of phonemes and syllables.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Semantic memory activation in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  J L Woodard; M Seidenberg; K A Nielson; P Antuono; L Guidotti; S Durgerian; Q Zhang; M Lancaster; N Hantke; A Butts; S M Rao
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.