Literature DB >> 29590600

Response of Single Cells to Shock Waves and Numerically Optimized Waveforms for Cancer Therapy.

Dongli Li1, Antonio Pellegrino2, Andre Hallack2, Nik Petrinic2, Antoine Jérusalem3, Robin O Cleveland4.   

Abstract

Shock waves are used clinically for breaking kidney stones and treating musculoskeletal indications. The mechanisms by which shock waves interact with tissue are still not well understood. Here, ultra-high-speed imaging was used to visualize the deformation of individual cells embedded in a tissue-mimicking phantom when subject to shock-wave exposure from a clinical source. Three kidney epithelial cell lines were considered to represent normal healthy (human renal epithelial), cancer (CAKI-2), and virus-transformed (HK-2) cells. The experimental results showed that during the compressive phase of the shock waves, there was a small (<2%) decrease in the projected cell area, but during the tensile phase, there was a relatively large (∼10%) increase in the projected cell area. The experimental observations were captured by a numerical model with a constitutive material framework consisting of an equation of state for the volumetric response and hyper-viscoelasticity for the deviatoric response. To model the volumetric cell response, it was necessary to change from a higher bulk modulus during the compression to a lower bulk modulus during the tensile shock loading. It was discovered that cancer cells showed a smaller deformation but faster response to the shock-wave tensile phase compared to their noncancerous counterparts. Cell viability experiments, however, showed that cancer cells suffered more damage than other cell types. These data suggest that the cell response to shock waves is specific to the type of cell and waveforms that could be tailored to an application. For example, the model predicts that a shock wave with a tensile stress of 4.59 MPa would increase cell membrane permeability for cancer cells with minimal impact on normal cells.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29590600      PMCID: PMC5883951          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  28 in total

1.  Nonlinear distortion of short pulses radiated by plane and focused circular pistons.

Authors:  M A Averkiou; M F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Application of Clinical Lithotripter Shock Waves to RNA Nucleotide Delivery to Cells.

Authors:  Sandra Nwokeoha; Robert Carlisle; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Shock wave treatment enhances cell proliferation and improves wound healing by ATP release-coupled extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation.

Authors:  Anna M Weihs; Christiane Fuchs; Andreas H Teuschl; Joachim Hartinger; Paul Slezak; Rainer Mittermayr; Heinz Redl; Wolfgang G Junger; Harald H Sitte; Dominik Rünzler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Mechanical properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Gang Zhang; Mian Long; Zhe-Zhi Wu; Wei-Qun Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The search for cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  E L Carstensen; S Gracewski; D Dalecki
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2003-04

7.  The hemodynamic destruction of intravascular cancer cells in relation to myocardial metastasis.

Authors:  L Weiss; D S Dimitrov; M Angelova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biomechanical interactions of cancer cells with the microvasculature during hematogenous metastasis.

Authors:  L Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Continuum modeling of a neuronal cell under blast loading.

Authors:  Antoine Jérusalem; Ming Dao
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Effects of Stretching Speed on Mechanical Rupture of Phospholipid/Cholesterol Bilayers: Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Taiki Shigematsu; Kenichiro Koshiyama; Shigeo Wada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Onco-Esthetics Dilemma: Is There a Role for Electrocosmetic-Medical Devices?

Authors:  Beniamino Palmieri; Lucia Palmieri; Andrea Mambrini; Valentina Pepe; Maria Vadalà
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Piezo1 Channels as Force Sensors in Mechanical Force-Related Chronic Inflammation.

Authors:  Hailin Liu; Jialing Hu; Qingcui Zheng; Xiaojin Feng; Fenfang Zhan; Xifeng Wang; Guohai Xu; Fuzhou Hua
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.