Literature DB >> 11175916

Precision error of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at the spine, hip, and forearm.

S Henzell1, S Dhaliwal, R Pontifex, F Gill, R Price, R Retallack, R Prince.   

Abstract

The current study investigated short-term precision of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans using a sample of subjects typically seen in a routine practice. Seventy-two women were scanned twice each in array fan-beam mode at the lumbar spine and 71 at the hip on a Hologic QDR 2000. Sixty-five were scanned at the forearm on a Hologic QDR 4500A in array mode. Each of the two scans was analysed without reference to its companion scan (independent analysis). The second assessment was also reanalyzed using the manufacturer's "Compare" function (compared analysis). Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated for the two forms of analysis at all the sites measured. Paired t-tests were performed to see whether the "Compare" function improved precision. The CV at the lumbar spine was 1.1% in both forms of analysis. The "Compare" function did not improve precision significantly at this site. The highest precision at the hip was found at the (Total) site of the hip (1.2-1.0%, independent and compared analyses, respectively) and the lowest at Ward's triangle. The Compare function significantly improved precision at Ward's triangle. The forearm had the best precision of all the sites measured with the Total site of the forearm being highest (0.5-0.7%) and the ultradistal site lowest (1.6-1.8%). The Compare function significantly decreased precision at the mid-distal and Total sites of the forearm. In conclusion, the highest precision was found at the Total site of the hip, the Total site of the forearm, and the spine. The Compare function did not significantly improve precision at the spine or hip (with the exception of Ward's triangle) and decreased precision at the forearm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11175916     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:4:359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  12 in total

1.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The measurement of bone mineral density of bilateral proximal humeri using DXA in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  J H Oh; B W Song; S H Kim; J-A Choi; J W Lee; S W Chung; T-Y Rhie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Pulse-echo ultrasound method for detection of post-menopausal women with osteoporotic BMD.

Authors:  J P Karjalainen; O Riekkinen; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Relationship of bone mineral density with valvular and annular calcification in community-dwelling older people: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Daniele Massera; Shuo Xu; Traci M Bartz; Anna E Bortnick; Joachim H Ix; Michel Chonchol; David S Owens; Eddy Barasch; Julius M Gardin; John S Gottdiener; John R Robbins; David S Siscovick; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Prediction of incident osteoporotic fractures in elderly women using the free estradiol index.

Authors:  A Devine; I M Dick; S S Dhaliwal; R Naheed; J Beilby; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; K Brown; C Cann; K Zhu; S Henzell; V Low; S Gustafsson; R I Price; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone mineral density and its determinants in diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study.

Authors:  V Rakic; W A Davis; S A P Chubb; F M A Islam; R L Prince; T M E Davis
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  The effects of homocysteine and MTHFR genotype on hip bone loss and fracture risk in elderly women.

Authors:  K Zhu; J Beilby; I M Dick; A Devine; M Soós; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone Mineral Density and Risk of Heart Failure in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Raymond B Fohtung; David L Brown; William J H Koh; Traci M Bartz; Laura D Carbone; Roberto Civitelli; Phyllis K Stein; Paulo H M Chaves; Bryan R Kestenbaum; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.