AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on bone density and metabolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed bone mineral density (BMD) measured at the hip, spine and forearm using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 34 patients with type 1 and 194 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were from the community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study, and findings for them were compared with those from normal age- and sex-matched control subjects from the local community. Biochemical and hormonal markers of bone metabolism were measured in a subset of 70 patients. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and BMI, there was a lower BMD at total hip (p<0.001) and femoral neck (p=0.012) in type 1 men vs control subjects, but type 1 women and matched controls had similar BMD at each site. There was a higher BMD at total hip (p=0.006), femoral neck (p=0.026) and forearm (p<0.001) in type 2 women vs control subjects, but diabetes status was not associated with BMD in type 2 men after adjustment for age and BMI. Serum oestradiol, BMI, C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type 1 and male sex were consistently and independently associated with BMD at forearm, hip and femoral neck and explained 61, 55 and 50% of the total variance in BMD, respectively, at these sites. Spine BMD was independently associated with BMI and ln(oestradiol). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Men with type 1 diabetes may be at increased risk of osteoporosis, while type 2 women appear to be protected even after adjusting for BMI. Low serum oestradiol concentrations may predispose to diabetes-associated osteoporosis regardless of sex.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on bone density and metabolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed bone mineral density (BMD) measured at the hip, spine and forearm using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 34 patients with type 1 and 194 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were from the community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study, and findings for them were compared with those from normal age- and sex-matched control subjects from the local community. Biochemical and hormonal markers of bone metabolism were measured in a subset of 70 patients. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and BMI, there was a lower BMD at total hip (p<0.001) and femoral neck (p=0.012) in type 1 men vs control subjects, but type 1 women and matched controls had similar BMD at each site. There was a higher BMD at total hip (p=0.006), femoral neck (p=0.026) and forearm (p<0.001) in type 2 women vs control subjects, but diabetes status was not associated with BMD in type 2 men after adjustment for age and BMI. Serum oestradiol, BMI, C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type 1 and male sex were consistently and independently associated with BMD at forearm, hip and femoral neck and explained 61, 55 and 50% of the total variance in BMD, respectively, at these sites. Spine BMD was independently associated with BMI and ln(oestradiol). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Men with type 1 diabetes may be at increased risk of osteoporosis, while type 2 women appear to be protected even after adjusting for BMI. Low serum oestradiol concentrations may predispose to diabetes-associated osteoporosis regardless of sex.
Authors: M Lunt; P Masaryk; C Scheidt-Nave; J Nijs; G Poor; H Pols; J A Falch; G Hammermeister; D M Reid; L Benevolenskaya; K Weber; J Cannata; T W O'Neill; D Felsenberg; A J Silman; J Reeve Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: R P Stolk; P L Van Daele; H A Pols; H Burger; A Hofman; J C Birkenhäger; S W Lamberts; D E Grobbee Journal: Bone Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: A P Chobot; A Haffke; J Polanska; Z P Halaba; G Deja; P Jarosz-Chobot; W Pluskiewicz Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-05-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: V N Shah; K K Harrall; C S Shah; T L Gallo; P Joshee; J K Snell-Bergeon; W M Kohrt Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Thomas C Register; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jianzhao Xu; S Carrie Smith; J Jeffrey Carr; Barry I Freedman; Donald W Bowden Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.617