Literature DB >> 6536277

Why do accident and emergency doctors request X-rays?

R A Warren, D G Ferguson.   

Abstract

A prospective study was carried out to analyse all X-rays requested from the three accident and emergency departments in Sheffield during one week. There were 3253 patients examined, of which 1028 (31.6%) were X-rayed, 1251 sets of X-rays being performed. Few X-rays (4.5%) were requested for medico-legal reasons. Skull X-rays were studied in particular detail. Only 5 (4.5%) of 112 films were subsequently reported as abnormal by the radiologist. The accident and emergency doctor's ability to predict X-ray outcome was not very good, their false positive rate being high at 21% while their false negative rate was low at 5.5%. This indicates that the accident and emergency doctors tended to be over cautious to compensate for their lack of experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6536277      PMCID: PMC1285217          DOI: 10.1136/emj.1.3.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Emerg Med        ISSN: 0264-4924


  10 in total

1.  Clinical and economic aspects of the use of X-rays in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  G de Lacey
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1976-10

2.  A Coroner's view of routine radiology.

Authors:  H H Pilling
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1976-10

3.  Medical and legal aspects of the increasing demand for diagnostic radiology. Radiological Resources.

Authors:  J C Raison
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1976-10

4.  The radiologist's dilemma.

Authors:  K T Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  G de Lacey; S Bradbrooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

6.  An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographs.

Authors:  G de Lacey; A Barker; J Harper; B Wignall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Risks of intracranial haematoma in head injured adults.

Authors:  A D Mendelow; G Teasdale; B Jennett; J Bryden; C Hessett; G Murray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-10-22

8.  Admission after mild head injury: benefits and costs.

Authors:  A D Mendelow; D A Campbell; R R Jeffrey; J D Miller; C Hessett; J Bryden; B Jennett
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-11-27

9.  Skull X-rays in minor head injury. A review of their use and interpretation by casualty officers.

Authors:  T C Gibson
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 0.729

10.  Reasons for requesting radiographs in an accident department.

Authors:  G de Lacey; A Barker; B Wignall; J Reidy; J Harper
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

2.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

Authors:  P Sujitkumar; J M Hadfield; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-06

3.  Fractures not X-rayed.

Authors:  H R Guly
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-09

4.  Radiography for back pain presenting to accident and emergency departments.

Authors:  M Gibson; N Zoltie
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.