Literature DB >> 18299821

Responses to multi-directional surface translations involve redistribution of proximal versus distal strategies to maintain upright posture.

Stephanie L Jones1, Sharon M Henry, Christine C Raasch, Juvena R Hitt, Janice Y Bunn.   

Abstract

Evaluation of postural control in multiple planes is necessary to determine the movement strategies used to respond to unexpected perturbations. The present study quantified net joint torques of the lower limbs and trunk in the sagittal and frontal planes following multi-directional surface translations. Twenty-one healthy subjects stood with feet on separate force plates mounted on a moveable platform, translated unexpectedly in one of 12 directions. Peak net torque magnitudes and latencies following perturbation onset were determined as were the relative contributions of each joint to total torque production. Magnitude of net torque generated by each leg varied by perturbation direction, with the largest individual joint magnitude elicited in directions of limb loading. Relative contributions of individual joint torques to the total response were dependent upon perturbation direction. Results suggest that a redistribution of the relative contributions of hip/trunk versus ankle strategies occurs dependent on perturbation direction, with a significant contribution by the knee joint in response to forward perturbations. Direction-specific redistribution of proximal versus distal strategies appears to depend upon the biomechanical constraints imposed by a given perturbation direction. Thus, it appears that sagittal and frontal plane posture-righting responses may not be uniquely controlled, and may instead be governed similarly, with modulation of relative torque contributions among joints when necessary, given direction-specific anatomical constraints.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18299821     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1312-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  NACOB presentation CSB New Investigator Award. Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. North American Congress on Biomechanics.

Authors:  S Rietdyk; A E Patla; D A Winter; M G Ishac; C E Little
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Environmental constraints on foot trajectory reveal the capacity for modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments during rapid triggered stepping reactions.

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Directional aspects of balance corrections in man.

Authors:  John H J Allum; Mark G Carpenter; Flurin Honegger
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

5.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance.

Authors:  D A Winter; F Prince; J S Frank; C Powell; K F Zabjek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Age-related differences in lower extremity power after support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Courtney D Hall; Jody L Jensen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Directional sensitivity of stretch reflexes and balance corrections for normal subjects in the roll and pitch planes.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J H Allum; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of varying acceleration of platform translation and toes-up rotations on the pattern and magnitude of balance reactions in humans.

Authors:  T Szturm; B Fallang
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Human automatic postural responses: responses to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions.

Authors:  S P Moore; D S Rushmer; S L Windus; L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Control of roll and pitch motion during multi-directional balance perturbations.

Authors:  Ursula Margareta Küng; C G C Horlings; F Honegger; J E J Duysens; J H J Allum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain in an active episode demonstrate temporally altered torque responses and direction-specific enhanced muscle activity following unexpected balance perturbations.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Postural control in response to a perturbation: role of vision and additional support.

Authors:  Vennila Krishnan; Krishnan Vennila; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Chronic neck pain alters muscle activation patterns to sudden movements.

Authors:  Shellie A Boudreau; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain use a trunk stiffening strategy to maintain upright posture.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Sharon M Henry; Christine C Raasch; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Stability of vertical posture explored with unexpected mechanical perturbations: synergy indices and motor equivalence.

Authors:  Momoko Yamagata; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of decreased visual acuity on control of posture.

Authors:  Sambit Mohapatra; Vennila Krishnan; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Role of angular position of the seat in control of posture in response to external perturbation.

Authors:  Adeolu Ademiluyi; Huaqing Liang; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of low back pain and of stabilization or movement-system-impairment treatments on induced postural responses: A planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Karen V Lomond; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-08-21

10.  Violation of the craniocentricity principle for vestibularly evoked balance responses under conditions of anisotropic stability.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.