Literature DB >> 11161347

Post-ingestive positive controls of ingestive behavior.

A Sclafani1.   

Abstract

Post-ingestive negative controls of ingestive behavior are well characterized. Nutrients act in the gut to inhibit meal size by direct actions on feeding and by conditioning a satiation response to orosensory (flavor) stimuli. Accumulating evidence indicates that there are also post-ingestive positive controls of ingestion that operate by conditioning flavor preference and increased acceptance. In several experiments rats trained to consume a flavored solution paired with intragastric carbohydrate infusions significantly increased their solution intake. Drinking bout size and number, and lick rates and burst size were also increased by carbohydrate infusions. Whether intake is stimulated or inhibited by post-ingestive nutrient actions depends upon several factors, including most notably nutrient concentration. Post-ingestive positive controls need to be incorporated into theoretical models of ingestive behavior. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11161347     DOI: 10.1006/appe.2000.0370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  51 in total

1.  Nutrient selection in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Xueying Ren; Jozélia G Ferreira; Ligang Zhou; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Catherine W Yeckel; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The gut-brain dopamine axis: a regulatory system for caloric intake.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Jozélia G Ferreira; Luis A Tellez; Xueying Ren; Catherine W Yeckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-03

Review 3.  Common cellular and molecular mechanisms in obesity and drug addiction.

Authors:  Paul J Kenny
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Cognitive and neuronal systems underlying obesity.

Authors:  Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-01-12

5.  Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time.

Authors:  M G Ramaekers; S Boesveldt; C M M Lakemond; M A J S van Boekel; P A Luning
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

9.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Cocaine is low on the value ladder of rats: possible evidence for resilience to addiction.

Authors:  Lauriane Cantin; Magalie Lenoir; Eric Augier; Nathalie Vanhille; Sarah Dubreucq; Fuschia Serre; Caroline Vouillac; Serge H Ahmed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.