Literature DB >> 11157828

Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model.

E Van Royen 1, K Mangelschots, D De Neubourg , I Laureys, G Ryckaert, J Gerris.   

Abstract

For optimal embryo selection in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), knowledge of the implantation potential is essential. This is a retrospective analysis of morphological characteristics and cleavage kinetics of day 3 embryos resulting in an objective assessment of the relative implantation potential of each distinct type of embryo. Therefore transferred embryos were sampled according to their documented implantation behaviour: all embryos without any implantation on the one hand and all those with 100% ongoing implantation on the other. There were 213 such embryos in the latter group of which only seven (3%) had >20% fragmentation and only one embryo (0.5%) showed multinucleation (an embryo containing >20% fragmentation). For this reason, only embryos with < or =20% fragmentation and without multinucleation were analysed. They were split up according to the amount of fragmentation and the number of blastomeres on day 2 and on day 3. For each type, the implanted fraction was calculated, i.e. the number certainly implanted divided by the sum of the number certainly implanted and the number certainly not implanted, thus describing its relative implantation potential. By extrapolation to the entire population it was possible to establish the implantation potential for each type of embryo. Optimal day 3 embryos were calculated to reach a mean of 47% ongoing implantation. By establishing the implantation potential for most embryos, this model also provides useful information about which embryos are worth freezing in a cost-effective cryopreservation policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157828     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Cycle characteristics of day 3 embryo transfers with 4-cell embryos only.

Authors:  G Ertzeid; R Storeng; T Tanbo; P O Dale; S Bjercke; T Abyholm
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media and morphology grading to predict implantation outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Xiong Li; Yan Xu; Jing Fu; Wen-Bi Zhang; Su-Ying Liu; Xiao-Xi Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Ryan J Heitmann; Terrance D Lewis; Alan H DeCherney; James R Graham; Eric Widra; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The association of the blastomere volume index (BVI), the blastomere symmetry index (BSI) and the mean ovality (MO) with ongoing implantation after single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Carlijn G Vergouw; Mays Al Nofal; E Hanna Kostelijk; Hans Rooth; Peter G A Hompes; Roel Schats; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The association between quality of supernumerary embryos in a cohort and implantation potential of the transferred blastocyst.

Authors:  Phillip A Romanski; Randi H Goldman; Leslie V Farland; Serene S Srouji; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Judy E Stern; Sangita K Jindal; Catherine Racowsky; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and embryo quality: Clues for single blastocyst transfer from double blastocyst transfer in an unselected population.

Authors:  Tetsuaki Hara; Takafumi Katsuki; Tomoyo Kusuda; Koso Ohama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-03

10.  Cell number considerations for blastocyst transfer in younger patients.

Authors:  Zhiren Liu; Mingting Jiang; Linyun He; Yun Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.