Literature DB >> 23433518

Number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers.

Micah J Hill1, Kevin S Richter, Ryan J Heitmann, Terrance D Lewis, Alan H DeCherney, James R Graham, Eric Widra, Michael J Levy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether live birth in single-blastocyst transfers is correlated with the number of sibling supernumerary vitrified blastocysts (embryos not transferred) generated from that same cycle.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: A large academic assisted reproduction clinic. PATIENT(S): All single-blastocyst transfers in 2010 graded as "good" embryos by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) criteria. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation and live birth. RESULT(S): Of the 655 single-blastocyst transfers that met inclusion criteria, implantation occurred in 65% and live birth in 54% of cycles. In chi-square analysis, patients with supernumerary vitrified blastocysts had a statistically higher implantation rate (65% versus 50%) and live-birth rate (56% versus 41%) when compared with patients without supernumerary blastocysts. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated an increase in implantation (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15) and live birth (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) with increasing number of supernumerary blastocysts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patient age and the number of supernumerary blastocysts were statistically significantly associated with implantation and live birth. CONCLUSION(S): The number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts correlated positively with the odds of implantation and live birth in good quality single-blastocyst transfers. Patients with supernumerary blastocysts are good candidates for single-embryo transfer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433518      PMCID: PMC3648793          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology.

Authors:  J Tesarik; A M Junca; A Hazout; F X Aubriot; C Nathan; P Cohen-Bacrie; M Dumont-Hassan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention.

Authors:  Anja Pinborg
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application.

Authors:  Juergen Liebermann; Michael J Tucker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals.

Authors:  A M van Peperstraten; W L D M Nelen; R P M G Hermens; L Jansen; E Scheenjes; D D M Braat; R P T M Grol; J A M Kremer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Culture of human spare preembryos: association between blastocyst formation and pregnancy.

Authors:  A Sjögren; P Sjöblom; L Hamberger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Ryan J Heitmann; James R Graham; Michael J Tucker; Alan H DeCherney; Paulette E Browne; Eric D Levens
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Marlene B Goldman; Harry Hatasaka; Todd A MacKenzie; Catherine Racowsky; Eric S Surrey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey.

Authors:  A M van Peperstraten; R P M G Hermens; W L D M Nelen; P F M Stalmeier; G J Scheffer; R P T M Grol; J A M Kremer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Marlene B Goldman; Harry Hatasaka; Todd A MacKenzie; Eric S Surrey; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Assisted hatching: trends and pregnancy outcomes, United States, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Jennifer F Kawwass; Michael Monsour; Sheree L Boulet; Donna R Session; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The association between quality of supernumerary embryos in a cohort and implantation potential of the transferred blastocyst.

Authors:  Phillip A Romanski; Randi H Goldman; Leslie V Farland; Serene S Srouji; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  National trends and outcomes of autologous in vitro fertilization cycles among women ages 40 years and older.

Authors:  Heather Hipp; Sara Crawford; Jennifer F Kawwass; Sheree L Boulet; David A Grainger; Dmitry M Kissin; Denise Jamieson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Predicting the probability of a live birth after a freeze-all based in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment strategy.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Zi-Li Sun; Miao-Xin Chen; Yang Yang; Xiao-Ming Teng; Yun Wang; Yuan-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-06

6.  Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Judy E Stern; Sangita K Jindal; Catherine Racowsky; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Predictive value of the number of frozen blastocysts in live birth rates of the transferred fresh embryos.

Authors:  Jianyuan Song; Cuicui Duan; Wangyu Cai; Jian Xu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.234

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.