Literature DB >> 23512090

The association of the blastomere volume index (BVI), the blastomere symmetry index (BSI) and the mean ovality (MO) with ongoing implantation after single embryo transfer.

Carlijn G Vergouw1, Mays Al Nofal, E Hanna Kostelijk, Hans Rooth, Peter G A Hompes, Roel Schats, Cornelis B Lambalk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To generate novel, objective variables that resemble embryo quality and relate them to ongoing implantation, using multilevel imaging of single-transferred embryos.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of multilevel images of 659 day 3 single-transferred embryos. Each embryo was photographed on seven different levels, in order to measure the largest diameter of every blastomere within an embryo. The volume of each blastomere was calculated using the equation [Formula: see text]. The blastomere volume index (BVI) represented the ratio between the total blastomeric volume of an embryo and the mean cytoplasmic volume of an oocyte on day 0. The blastomere symmetry index (BSI) represented the ratio between the greatest blastomere volume and the smallest blastomere volume within an embryo. The mean ovality (MO) represented the presence of non-spherical blastomeres. Analyses were performed to compare the BVI, BSI and MO between patients with and without an ongoing implantation.
RESULTS: The mean BVI was significantly higher for embryos in the ongoing implantation group compared to the no ongoing implantation group. The mean BSI was associated with ongoing implantation for unevenly cleaved embryos. The MO of blastomeres within an embryo was similar for embryos in the ongoing implantation group compared to the no ongoing implantation group. The association of the BVI and BSI with ongoing implantation was confounded, because only female age and cleavage rate were significantly associated with ongoing implantation in multiple logistic regression analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The BVI, BSI and MO are objective variables that resemble embryo quality, but they are not suitable to use as embryo selection tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23512090      PMCID: PMC3644125          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-9970-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  22 in total

Review 1.  Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Tomasz Baczkowski; Rafał Kurzawa; Wojciech Głabowski
Journal:  Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 2.  Pathogenesis, developmental consequences, and clinical correlations of human embryo fragmentation.

Authors:  Victor Y Fujimoto; Richard W Browne; Michael S Bloom; Denny Sakkas; Mina Alikani
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading.

Authors:  Allison E Baxter Bendus; Jacob F Mayer; Sharon K Shipley; William H Catherino
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Morphometric categorization of the human oocyte and early conceptus.

Authors:  V J Goyanes; A Ron-Corzo; E Costas; E Maneiro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Ziebe; K Petersen; S Lindenberg; A G Andersen; A Gabrielsen; A N Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Morphometric parameters of living human in-vitro fertilization embryos; importance of the asynchronous division process.

Authors:  C Roux; C Joanne; G Agnani; M Fromm; M C Clavequin; J L Bresson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation.

Authors:  M Alikani; J Cohen; G Tomkin; G J Garrisi; C Mack; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Total cytoplasmic volume as biomarker of fragmentation in human embryos.

Authors:  Christina Hnida; Søren Ziebe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Analysis of factors contributing to success in a program of micromanipulation-assisted fertilization.

Authors:  G J Garrisi; A J Chin; P M Dolan; H M Nagler; M Vasquez-Levin; D Navot; J W Gordon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos.

Authors:  Goedele Paternot; Johanna Devroe; Sophie Debrock; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Carl Spiessens
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  1 in total

1.  The impacts of the number of prefreeze and postthaw blastomeres on embryo implantation potential: A systematic analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Jiang Wang; Wen-Juan Liu; Lin Fan; Zi-Tao Li; Yu-Qiang Huang; Chuang-Qi Chen; Dun Liu; Xi-Qian Zhang; Feng-Hua Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.