Literature DB >> 16212700

Toward a unified model of vertebrate rod phototransduction.

R D Hamer1, S C Nicholas, D Tranchina, T D Lamb, J L P Jarvinen.   

Abstract

Recently, we introduced a phototransduction model that was able to account for the reproducibility of vertebrate rod single-photon responses (SPRs) (Hamer et al., 2003). The model was able to reproduce SPR statistics by means of stochastic activation and inactivation of rhodopsin (R*), transducin (G alpha ), and phosphodiesterase (PDE). The features needed to capture the SPR statistics were (1) multiple steps of R* inactivation by means of multiple phosphorylations (followed by arrestin capping) and (2) phosphorylation dependence of the affinity between R* and the three molecules competing to bind with R* (G alpha, arrestin, and rhodopsin kinase). The model was also able to account for several other rod response features in the dim-flash regime, including SPRs obtained from rods in which various elements of the cascade have been genetically disabled or disrupted. However, the model was not tested under high light-level conditions. We sought to evaluate the extent to which the multiple phosphorylation model could simultaneously account for single-photon response behavior, as well as responses to high light levels causing complete response saturation and/or significant light adaptation (LA). To date no single model, with one set of parameters, has been able to do this. Dim-flash responses and statistics were simulated using a hybrid stochastic/deterministic model and Monte-Carlo methods as in Hamer et al. (2003). A dark-adapted flash series, and stimulus paradigms from the literature eliciting various degrees of light adaptation (LA), were simulated using a full differential equation version of the model that included the addition of Ca2+-feedback onto rhodopsin kinase via recoverin. With this model, using a single set of parameters, we attempted to account for (1) SPR waveforms and statistics (as in Hamer et al., 2003); (2) a full dark-adapted flash-response series, from dim flash to saturating, bright flash levels, from a toad rod; (3) steady-state LA responses, including LA circulating current (as in Koutalos et al., 1995) and LA flash sensitivity measured in rods from four species; (4) step responses from newt rods ( Forti et al., 1989) over a large dynamic range; (5) dynamic LA responses, such as the step-flash paradigm of Fain et al. (1989), and the two-flash paradigm of Murnick and Lamb (1996); and (6) the salient response features from four knockout rod preparations. The model was able to meet this stringent test, accounting for almost all the salient qualitative, and many quantitative features, of the responses across this broad array of stimulus conditions, including SPR reproducibility. The model promises to be useful in testing hypotheses regarding both normal and abnormal photoreceptor function, and is a good starting point for development of a full-range model of cone phototransduction. Informative limitations of the model are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16212700      PMCID: PMC1482458          DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805224045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  100 in total

1.  Control of rhodopsin multiple phosphorylation.

Authors:  H Ohguro; R S Johnson; L H Ericsson; K A Walsh; K Palczewski
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Bleached pigment activates transduction in isolated rods of the salamander retina.

Authors:  M C Cornwall; G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The calcium feedback signal in the phototransduction cascade of vertebrate rods.

Authors:  M P Gray-Keller; P B Detwiler
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Phototransduction mechanism in retinal rods and cones. The Friedenwald Lecture.

Authors:  K W Yau
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Duration and amplitude of the light-induced cGMP hydrolysis in vertebrate photoreceptors are regulated by multiple phosphorylation of rhodopsin and by arrestin binding.

Authors:  U Wilden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Purification and physiological evaluation of a guanylate cyclase activating protein from retinal rods.

Authors:  W A Gorczyca; M P Gray-Keller; P B Detwiler; K Palczewski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dark adaptation of toad rod photoreceptors following small bleaches.

Authors:  C S Leibrock; T Reuter; T D Lamb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Amino-terminal myristoylation induces cooperative calcium binding to recoverin.

Authors:  J B Ames; T Porumb; T Tanaka; M Ikura; L Stryer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-03-03       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Free calcium concentrations in bullfrog rods determined in the presence of multiple forms of Fura-2.

Authors:  S T McCarthy; J P Younger; W G Owen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Modulation of transduction gain in light adaptation of retinal rods.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; J Jin; G J Jones
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  37 in total

1.  G-protein betagamma-complex is crucial for efficient signal amplification in vision.

Authors:  Alexander V Kolesnikov; Loryn Rikimaru; Anne K Hennig; Peter D Lukasiewicz; Steven J Fliesler; Victor I Govardovskii; Vladimir J Kefalov; Oleg G Kisselev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The dynamics of phosphodiesterase activation in rods and cones.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; David Holcman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Detection of single photons by toad and mouse rods.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Johan Pahlberg; Michael L Woodruff; Alapakkam P Sampath; Gordon L Fain; David Holcman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Not all quiet on the noise front.

Authors:  Emma McCullagh; Justin Farlow; Christopher Fuller; Juliet Girard; Joanna Lipinski-Kruszka; Dan Lu; Thomas Noriega; Geoffrey Rollins; Russell Spitzer; Michael Todhunter; Hana El-Samad
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  Impact of cone dystrophy-related mutations in GCAP1 on a kinetic model of phototransduction.

Authors:  Daniele Dell'Orco; Stefan Sulmann; Patrick Zägel; Valerio Marino; Karl-Wilhelm Koch
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Kinetics of turn-offs of frog rod phototransduction cascade.

Authors:  Luba A Astakhova; Michael L Firsov; Victor I Govardovskii
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  The 9-methyl group of retinal is essential for rapid Meta II decay and phototransduction quenching in red cones.

Authors:  Maureen E Estevez; Alexander V Kolesnikov; Petri Ala-Laurila; Rosalie K Crouch; Victor I Govardovskii; M Carter Cornwall
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Kinetics of M1 muscarinic receptor and G protein signaling to phospholipase C in living cells.

Authors:  Björn H Falkenburger; Jill B Jensen; Bertil Hille
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.