Literature DB >> 11144593

Some effects of duration on vowel recognition.

J M Hillenbrand1, M J Clark, R A Houde.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the role of duration in vowel perception by testing listeners on the identification of CVC syllables generated at different durations. Test signals consisted of synthesized versions of 300 utterances selected from a large, multitalker database of /hVd/ syllables [Hillenbrand et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099-3111 (1995)]. Four versions of each utterance were synthesized: (1) an original duration set (vowel duration matched to the original utterance), (2) a neutral duration set (duration fixed at 272 ms, the grand mean across all vowels), (3) a short duration set (duration fixed at 144 ms, two standard deviations below the mean), and (4) a long duration set (duration fixed at 400 ms, two standard deviations above the mean). Experiment 1 used a formant synthesizer, while a second experiment was an exact replication using a sinusoidal synthesis method that represented the original vowel spectrum more precisely than the formant synthesizer. Findings included (1) duration had a small overall effect on vowel identity since the great majority of signals were identified correctly at their original durations and at all three altered durations; (2) despite the relatively small average effect of duration, some vowels, especially [see text] and [see text], were significantly affected by duration; (3) some vowel contrasts that differ systematically in duration, such as [see text], and [see text], were minimally affected by duration; (4) a simple pattern recognition model appears to be capable of accounting for several features of the listening test results, especially the greater influence of duration on some vowels than others; and (5) because a formant synthesizer does an imperfect job of representing the fine details of the original vowel spectrum, results using the formant-synthesized signals led to a slight overestimate of the role of duration in vowel recognition, especially for the shortened vowels.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144593     DOI: 10.1121/1.1323463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Identification of synthetic vowels based on a time-varying model of the vocal tract area function.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonological Knowledge Guides Two-year-olds' and Adults' Interpretation of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning.

Authors:  Carolyn Quam; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: comparison of three training methods.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

5.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stability of Temporal Contrasts across Speaking Styles in English and Croatian.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2008-01

8.  Identification of synthetic vowels based on selected vocal tract area functions.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.