BACKGROUND: Stage IV gastric carcinoma is rarely curatively resected and almost invariably carries a poor prognosis. Several clinicopathologic factors are involved, but lymphatic spread of the cancer may significantly affect survival. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was designed to evaluate whether the nodal metastatic rate (number of lymph node metastases/number of resected lymph nodes) is a parameter of lymphatic spread and could provide a significant prognostic factor. Several prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis in 153 stage IV gastric carcinoma patients with histopathologic data on nodal metastasis. RESULTS: A significant difference in survival was observed in the stage IV cancer patients with total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rates < 50% versus those with rates > 50%. Multivariate analysis revealed that a total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rate > 50% was a highly significant prognostic factor. The gastric nodal metastatic rate can be used in patients who do not undergo an extended lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic spread of gastric carcinoma expressed in terms of the total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rate is a significant prognostic factor. The latter can be calculated without pathologic data derived from extended lymphadenectomy, and so it is universally applicable.
BACKGROUND: Stage IV gastric carcinoma is rarely curatively resected and almost invariably carries a poor prognosis. Several clinicopathologic factors are involved, but lymphatic spread of the cancer may significantly affect survival. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was designed to evaluate whether the nodal metastatic rate (number of lymph node metastases/number of resected lymph nodes) is a parameter of lymphatic spread and could provide a significant prognostic factor. Several prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis in 153 stage IV gastric carcinomapatients with histopathologic data on nodal metastasis. RESULTS: A significant difference in survival was observed in the stage IV cancerpatients with total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rates < 50% versus those with rates > 50%. Multivariate analysis revealed that a total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rate > 50% was a highly significant prognostic factor. The gastric nodal metastatic rate can be used in patients who do not undergo an extended lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic spread of gastric carcinoma expressed in terms of the total nodal or gastric nodal metastatic rate is a significant prognostic factor. The latter can be calculated without pathologic data derived from extended lymphadenectomy, and so it is universally applicable.