Literature DB >> 16076967

Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

H Miyata1, M Takahashi, T Saito, H Tachimori, I Kai.   

Abstract

Telling people that they have cancer has a great impact on their lives, so many doctors are concerned about how they should inform patients about a cancer diagnosis and its prognosis. We conducted a general population survey in Japan to investigate people's preferences on receiving this information. There were no significant differences in respondents' preferences according to the seriousness of the cancer. Full disclosure of the diagnosis was preferred by 86.1% of the respondents, while 2.7% wanted non-disclosure. As for the initial provision of information, the majority preferred partial disclosure concerning the prospects of complete recovery (64.5%) and the expected length of survival (64.1%). Those who responded negatively to the statement, "If I am close to the end of my life, I want to be informed of the fact so I can choose my own way of life", were more likely to want non-disclosure on diagnosis. The results suggest that, at the first opportunity of providing information, a disclosure policy of giving patients full details of their diagnosis and some information on prognosis can satisfy the preferences of most patients. Contrary to popular belief, the seriousness of the cancer and people's demographic characteristics displayed little impact in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076967      PMCID: PMC1734201          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.007302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  17 in total

1.  Changes in disclosure of information to cancer patients in a general hospital in Japan.

Authors:  N Horikawa; T Yamazaki; M Sagawa; T Nagata
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.238

2.  Should doctors inform terminally ill patients? The opinions of nationals and doctors in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  A Harrison; A M al-Saadi; A S al-Kaabi; M R al-Kaabi; S S al-Bedwawi; S O al-Kaabi; S B al-Neaimi
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Truth telling to the patient.

Authors:  A Surbone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Responsibility and cancer disclosure in Japan.

Authors:  Todd S Elwyn; Michael D Fetters; Hiroki Sasaki; Tsukasa Tsuda
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The disclosure of information to cancer patients and its relationship to their mental state in a consultation-liaison psychiatry setting in Japan.

Authors:  N Horikawa; T Yamazaki; M Sagawa; T Nagata
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.238

6.  Physician's attitudes towards disclosure of cancer diagnosis to elderly patients: a report from Tokyo, Japan.

Authors:  S Kawakami; G Arai; K Ueda; Y Murai; H Yokomichi; M Aoshima; K Takagi
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately?

Authors:  Martin H N Tattersall; Melina Gattellari; Katie Voigt; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Questioning diagnosis disclosure in terminal cancer patients: a prospective study evaluating patients' responses.

Authors:  C Centeno-Cortés; J M Núñez-Olarte
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients?

Authors:  O O Thomsen; H R Wulff; A Martin; P A Singer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  What do advanced cancer patients know of their disease? A report from Italy.

Authors:  P Pronzato; G Bertelli; P Losardo; M Landucci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  14 in total

1.  Disclosure of Cancer Diagnosis: an Individualized and Non-paternalistic Approach Is Preferred.

Authors:  Mohammad Al Qadire
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Revealing a cancer diagnosis to patients: attitudes of patients, families, friends, nurses, and physicians in Lebanon-results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  F Farhat; A Othman; G El Baba; J Kattan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Information to cancer patients: a questionnaire survey in three different geographical areas in Italy.

Authors:  R Bracci; E Zanon; R Cellerino; R Gesuita; F Puglisi; G Aprile; V Barbieri; D Misuraca; S Venuta; F Carle; A Piga
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Italian onco-haematological patients' preferences in bad news communication: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Ramona Bongelli; Alessia Bertolazzi; Ludovica Piccioni; Roberto Burro
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Survey of the general public's attitudes toward advance directives in Japan: how to respect patients' preferences.

Authors:  Hiroaki Miyata; Hiromi Shiraishi; Ichiro Kai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.

Authors:  Lucija Murgic; Philip C Hébert; Slavica Sovic; Gordana Pavlekovic
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Giving bad news: a qualitative research exploration.

Authors:  Fereshteh Aein; Masoumeh Delaram
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 8.  Palliative care in cancer: managing patients' expectations.

Authors:  Wsam A Ghandourh
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-08-09

9.  Disclosure of cancer diagnosis and prognosis: a survey of the general public's attitudes toward doctors and family holding discretionary powers.

Authors:  Hiroaki Miyata; Hisateru Tachimori; Miyako Takahashi; Tami Saito; Ichiro Kai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Kempf; Jennifer A de Beyer; Jonathan Cook; Jane Holmes; Seid Mohammed; Tri-Long Nguyên; Iveta Simera; Marialena Trivella; Douglas G Altman; Sally Hopewell; Karel G M Moons; Raphael Porcher; Johannes B Reitsma; Willi Sauerbrei; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.