Literature DB >> 11138799

The role of echolocation in the hunting of terrestrial prey--new evidence for an underestimated strategy in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

S Schmidt1, S Hanke, J Pillat.   

Abstract

The observation that gleaning bats detect prey by its noises, together with difficulties in recording their faint sonar calls, have led some authors to conclude that gleaning bats may not use echolocation in certain hunting situations. In particular, it is conjectured that echolocation plays no role in the classification and tracking of prey. In the present study, we show that the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra, is able to find silent and motionless prey on the ground. The significance of sonar for catching a variety of terrestrial prey is established in a standardized situation. Sonar calls were found to be emitted during all stages, i.e. approach, hovering above the prey, and return to the roost, of every hunting flight. The harmonic pattern of the calls differed significantly between these stages, calls with three or more prominent components prevailing during hovering. Bats identified prey and rejected dummies while hovering above them. During this stage, increased call rates and reduced call durations were found. Echolocation activity during, and the duration of, the hovering phase depended on prey type, in particular on prey movement. The prey-dependent shifts in sonar activity, the broadband call structure with an emphasis on higher harmonics, and a systematic shift of the calls' peak frequencies during hovering, are discussed as adaptations to identifying prey by sonar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138799     DOI: 10.1007/s003590000151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Object recognition by echolocation: a nectar-feeding bat exploiting the flowers of a rain forest vine.

Authors:  D von Helversen; O von Helversen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Ecomorphological analysis of trophic niche partitioning in a tropical savannah bat community.

Authors:  Luis F Aguirre; Anthony Herrel; R van Damme; E Matthysen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Complex echo classification by echo-locating bats: a review.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias O Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Echolocation behaviour of Megaderma lyra during typical orientation situations and while hunting aerial prey: a field study.

Authors:  Sabine Schmidt; Wipula Yapa; Jan-Eric Grunwald
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Hemprich's long-eared bat (Otonycteris hemprichii) as a predator of scorpions: whispering echolocation, passive gleaning and prey selection.

Authors:  Marc Holderied; Carmi Korine; Thorsten Moritz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Behavioral responses of big brown bats to dives by praying mantises.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Jeffrey D Triblehorn; Kari Bohn; David D Yager; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.