Literature DB >> 11138681

Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging: multicenter trial results.

I Khalkhali1, J Villanueva-Meyer, S L Edell, J L Connolly, S J Schnitt, J K Baum, M J Houlihan, R M Jenkins, S B Haber.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although mammography is well established as a first-line tool for breast cancer screening and detection, efforts to develop complementary procedures continue. Observation of 99mTc-sestamibi tumor uptake provided the impetus for its evaluation as an adjunctive technique. This trial's objectives were to determine in a multicenter trial the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi in women with suspected breast cancer and to investigate factors influencing diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: Our multicenter trial enrolled 673 women (387 with nonpalpable abnormalities; 286 with palpable abnormalities) scheduled for excisional biopsy or mastectomy. Blinded and unblinded interpretations of scintigraphic images were compared with core laboratory established histopathologic diagnoses to define the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging.
RESULTS: Blinded readers' diagnostic accuracy was 78%-81%. Inter-reader agreement was excellent, ranging from 95% to 100% (kappa = 0.82-0.99). Overall institutional sensitivity and specificity for 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging were 75.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In this population with a 40.1% disease prevalence, the positive predictive value was 74.5% and the negative predictive value was 83.4%. The negative predictive value was 94% in patients with a 40% or lower mammographic likelihood of breast cancer. Sensitivity was higher for palpable abnormalities; specificity was higher for nonpalpable abnormalities. Sensitivity was decreased for tumors <1 cm in largest dimension but appeared not to be affected by patient's age.
CONCLUSION: As an adjunct to current procedures, 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging may contribute to patient management decisions in selected populations, including women with dense breasts, mammographically indeterminate lesions >1 cm, and palpable abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  17 in total

1.  Breast scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Characterization of simulated incident scatter and the impact on quantification in dedicated breast single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Steve D Mann; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Amanda L Weinmann; Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An incidentally detected breast cancer on tc-99m MIBI cardiac scintigraphy.

Authors:  Duray Seker; Gaye Seker; Emine Ozturk; Bahattin Bayar; Hakan Kulacoglu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 7.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Use of tomographic nuclear medicine procedures, SPECT and pinhole SPECT, with cationic lipophilic radiotracers for the evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Madeddu; Angela Spanu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; John R Buscombe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  99mTc glucarate high-resolution imaging of drug sensitive and drug resistant human breast cancer xenografts in SCID mice.

Authors:  Zhonglin Liu; Gail D Stevenson; Harrison H Barrett; George A Kastis; Michel Bettan; Lars R Furenlid; Donald W Wilson; James M Woolfenden; Koon Yan Pak
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.