PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to analyze the effect of preoperative central corneal thickness and corneal keratometric power on flap thickness. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: One hundred forty eyes with a mean preoperative pachymetry of 554.4 microm +/- 36.3 (SD) and a mean keratometry of 43.5 +/- 1.9 diopters had LASIK using the Hansatome automated microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and a 193 nm argon-fluoride excimer laser (Summit SVS Apex Plus). The 180 microm microkeratome plate was used in all procedures. Corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter (Advent, Mentor O&O Inc.) before and during the flap procedure, and the difference was taken as flap thickness. The data were analyzed using a 1-tailed t test and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean flap thickness was 120. 8 +/- 26.3 microm. There was a low correlation between baseline central corneal thickness and corneal flap thickness (P =.6, r = 0. 046). There was no correlation between preoperative keratometry and flap thickness (P =.01, r = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: The Hansatome microkeratome does not always produce a corneal flap of the intended thickness. Factors other than keratometry and pachymetry must affect flap thickness.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to analyze the effect of preoperative central corneal thickness and corneal keratometric power on flap thickness. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: One hundred forty eyes with a mean preoperative pachymetry of 554.4 microm +/- 36.3 (SD) and a mean keratometry of 43.5 +/- 1.9 diopters had LASIK using the Hansatome automated microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and a 193 nm argon-fluoride excimer laser (Summit SVS Apex Plus). The 180 microm microkeratome plate was used in all procedures. Corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter (Advent, Mentor O&O Inc.) before and during the flap procedure, and the difference was taken as flap thickness. The data were analyzed using a 1-tailed t test and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean flap thickness was 120. 8 +/- 26.3 microm. There was a low correlation between baseline central corneal thickness and corneal flap thickness (P =.6, r = 0. 046). There was no correlation between preoperative keratometry and flap thickness (P =.01, r = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: The Hansatome microkeratome does not always produce a corneal flap of the intended thickness. Factors other than keratometry and pachymetry must affect flap thickness.