Literature DB >> 12605270

Impact of head advance and oscillation rate on the flap parameter: a comparison of two microkeratomes.

Stefanie Hoffmann1, Frank Krummenauer, Mana Tehrani, H Burkhard Dick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare flap quality and thickness in an experimental setting using the Amadeus and Carriazo/Barraquer microkeratomes.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty-three fresh porcine cadaver eyes were used to cut corneal flaps. One hundred and thirty-five eyes were cut using the Amadeus microkeratome with various settings of head advance and oscillation rate, 28 eyes using the Carriazo/Barraquer microkeratome (Supratome). Flap diameter and hinge width were measured by planimetry and flap thickness by ultrasound pachymetry. Descriptive statistical analysis was based on medians and quartiles, graphical representation on box plots. The measurement devices were compared by two sample Wilcoxon tests, their deviation from the distributors' reference measurement values by sign tests.
RESULTS: Variation of oscillation rate and head advance led to significant differences in flap thickness. Optimal cut quality was achieved with 1 mm/s head advance and 8,000 rpm in the Amadeus microkeratome. With this setting the smallest target deviations in flap thickness were obtained among the results with lowest range (median 170 micro m, interquartile range 18 micro m, target 160 micro m). The Amadeus microkeratome demonstrated a statistically significant lower deviation from the target thickness ( P<0.001) and also a lower range than the Supratome (median 127 micro m, interquartile range 30 micro m, target 140 micro m; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of microkeratome settings leads to minimized deviation from target thickness and improved parameter. The Amadeus microkeratome achieved a statistically significant lower deviation in flap thickness than the Carriazo/Barraquer microkeratome. Individualization of the microkeratome settings may help to decrease flap complications and improve refractive outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12605270     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0599-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  Flap complications associated with lamellar refractive surgery.

Authors:  R T Lin; R K Maloney
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  [Precision of lenticular thickness in relation to full stroma corneal thickness. Experimental results with the lamellar microkeratome].

Authors:  C Wilmes; J Draeger; M Kohlhaas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  F W Price; D L Koller; M O Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Acoustic velocity and attenuation of eye tissues at 20 MHz.

Authors:  C L de Korte; A F van der Steen; J M Thijssen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome.

Authors:  R Yildirim; C Aras; A Ozdamar; H Bahcecioglu; S Ozkan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effect of resection velocity and suction ring on corneal flap formation in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Y H Kim; J S Choi; H J Chun; C K Joo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Evaluation of corneal flap dimensions and cut quality using the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome.

Authors:  A Behrens; B Seitz; A Langenbucher; M M Kus; C Rummelt; M Küchle
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Lower intraoperative flap complication rate with the Hansatome microkeratome compared to the Automated Corneal Shaper.

Authors:  M B Walker; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis: etiology, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  R Ambrósio; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of two microkeratome systems.

Authors:  P S Binder; M Moore; R W Lambert; D M Seagrist
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Femtosecond laser in refractive surgery].

Authors:  H B Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jens Heichel; Frank Wilhelm; Kathleen S Kunert; Rabea Schlueter; Ute Stuhltraeger; Thomas Hammer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.