Literature DB >> 11127671

Particulate bone grafting of osteolytic femoral lesions around stable cementless stems.

E R Benson1, C P Christensen, E A Monesmith, S L Gomes, B E Bierbaum.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of particulate grafting for proximal femoral osteolysis in the presence of a well-fixed cementless femoral stem at the time of acetabular liner change or revision. Sixteen patients (17 hips) who averaged 51 years of age underwent curettage and packing of proximal femoral osteolytic lesions with cancellous allograft. Modular acetabular liners were changed in 11 patients, acetabular revisions were performed in six patients, and femoral heads were exchanged in all patients. The femoral component was retained in all patients. The majority of patients were asymptomatic before revision surgery. The size of the femoral osteolytic lesions was measured preoperatively and postoperatively with anteroposterior and Lauenstein lateral radiographs of the hip. Preoperatively, the average lesion was 41 x 16 mm on the anteroposterior view and 18 x 7 mm on the lateral view. The average clinical and radiographic followup was 39 and 32 months, respectively, with a minimum followup of 24 months. All but one patient remained asymptomatic during the followup period and no femoral stem showed evidence of loosening. The size of the femoral osteolytic lesion averaged 16 x 6 mm on the anteroposterior view and 6 x 2 mm on the lateral view at most recent followup. In 15 of 17 patients, the size of the femoral lesion had regressed. This technique seems to be a viable means of preventing progressive osteolysis and femoral loosening while preserving bone stock for future reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11127671     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200012000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Kirk E Smith; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

4.  Correlation of computed tomography with histology in the assessment of periprosthetic defect healing.

Authors:  Stephen D Cook; Laura P Patron; Samantha L Salkeld; Kirk E Smith; Bruce Whiting; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Jacques Pariat; Steffen Queinnec; Yasuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Granuloma debridement and the use of an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement in the treatment of osteolysis in an uncemented total knee replacement.

Authors:  Henry D Atkinson; Vijai S Ranawat; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Femoral osteolysis around the unrevised stem during isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Byung-Woo Min; Kwang-Soon Song; Chul-Hyun Cho; Ki-Cheor Bae; Kyung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.