Literature DB >> 19742082

Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

R Stephen J Burnett1, James A Keeney, William J Maloney, John C Clohisy.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight knees in 26 patients underwent revision TKA requiring surgical management of major osteolytic defects. Three groups of osteolytic defects were identified based upon the degree of implant stability and the magnitude of bone loss. Outcome measures included the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS), visual analog pain score, and radiographs. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, the average knee pain scores, range of motion, and KSCRS improved (p<.05). Ninety-six percent of the knees demonstrated clinical and functional improvement. Radiographs for 24 revision TKA's (86 percent) demonstrated component stability and incorporation of both cancellous and structural allografts. Revision TKA for major osteolytic defects may be effectively performed using a variety of bone grafting techniques. Both morselized and structural bone grafting, in combination with stemmed components was successful in managing revision TKA in the setting of major osteolysis. Significant improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes may be anticipated using these surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19742082      PMCID: PMC2723689     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  39 in total

1.  Early failures in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; W L Griffin; J B Mason; M Nadaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Benjamin; G Engh; B Parsley; T Donaldson; T Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision knee arthroplasty using impaction grafting and primary implants.

Authors:  I C Heyligers; E H van Haaren; P I Wuisman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Femoral bone grafting in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J van Loon; M M Wijers; M C de Waal Malefijt; P Buma; R P Veth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement.

Authors:  S A Mikulak; O M Mahoney; M A dela Rosa; T P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Jeffrey A Murphy; T David Hayes; Donald W Roberts; Donald L Pomeroy; William L Griffin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Uncemented acetabular components with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results at five to twelve years.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; D J Berry; R T Trousdale; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Particulate bone grafting of osteolytic femoral lesions around stable cementless stems.

Authors:  E R Benson; C P Christensen; E A Monesmith; S L Gomes; B E Bierbaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design : five to eight-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michael R O'Rourke; John J Callaghan; Devon D Goetz; Patrick M Sullivan; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Polyethylene quality affects revision knee liner exchange survivorship.

Authors:  C Anderson Engh; Nancy L Parks; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: hybrid vs standard cemented fixation.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Albareda-Albareda; Belén Seral-García; Nieves Blanco-Rubio; Laura Ezquerra-Herrando
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 5.  Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero; Carlos A Encinas-Ullán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.