Literature DB >> 25863540

Predicting postoperative day 1 hematocrit levels after uncomplicated hysterectomy.

Carolyn W Swenson1, Michael S Lanham2, Daniel M Morgan2, Mitchell B Berger2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for predicting postoperative hematocrit levels after uncomplicated hysterectomy.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were analyzed from the Michigan Surgery Quality Collaborative for non-emergent hysterectomies performed for benign indications among women aged at least 18 years between January 1, 2012, and April 4, 2014. Linear mixed models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The model was developed with data from 4747 hysterectomies and validated on 1184 cases. In the mixed multivariate analysis, higher postoperative day 1 (POD1) hematocrit levels were associated with higher weight (B=0.03222, P<0.001), higher preoperative hematocrit (B=0.6587, P<0.001), and non-vaginal hysterectomy (B=0.2815, P=0.0055). Lower POD1 hematocrit was associated with higher preoperative platelet count (B=-0.00457, P<0.001), greater estimated blood loss (B=-0.00652, P<0.001), and larger intraoperative crystalloid volume (B=-0.3303, P<0.001). The final model predicted POD1 hematocrit within 4% points of the actual value for 91.7% of cases in the validation set.
CONCLUSION: Use of the model after uncomplicated hysterectomy might help to support the practice of selectively conducting postoperative hematocrit tests after hysterectomy in a clinically thoughtful and cost-effective manner.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Postoperative hematocrit

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863540      PMCID: PMC4461480          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  13 in total

1.  Routine hematocrit after elective gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  N Kohli; P K Mallipeddi; J M Neff; E H Sze; T W Roat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Predictors of postoperative hematocrit and association of hematocrit with adverse outcomes for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Zaza Samadashvili; Stephen J Lahey; Alfred T Culliford; Robert S D Higgins; Desmond Jordan; Jeffrey P Gold; Craig R Smith; Andrew Wechsler
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: a legacy of Shukri Khuri.

Authors:  Darrell A Campbell; James J Kubus; Peter K Henke; Max Hutton; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults.

Authors:  Samuel B Nadler; John H Hidalgo; Ted Bloch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

Authors:  C Ottosen; G Lingman; L Ottosen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Factors that predict low hematocrit levels in the postpartum patient after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Linda A Petersen; Deborah S Lindner; Charmaine M Kleiber; M Bridget Zimmerman; Almira T Hinton; Jerome Yankowitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Tariq Miskry; Adam Magos
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  A model for clinical estimation of perioperative hemorrhage.

Authors:  Christopher Howe; Christopher Paschall; Amit Panwalkar; James Beal; Anil Potti
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.389

9.  Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Mary Ellen Wechter; Elizabeth J Geller; Thao V Nguyen; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Bogani; Antonella Cromi; Stefano Uccella; Maurizio Serati; Jvan Casarin; Ciro Pinelli; Chiara Lazzarini; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.