Literature DB >> 11115677

Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur.

G Mather1, D R Smith.   

Abstract

Depth-of-focus limitations introduce spatial blur in images of three-dimensional scenes. It is not clear how the visual system combines depth information derived from image blur with information from other depth cues. Stereoscopic disparity is the pre-eminent depth cue, so experiments were conducted to investigate interactions between image blur and stereoscopic disparity. Observers viewed two random dot stereograms (RDSs) in a 2AFC task, and were required to identify the RDS depicting the greatest depth. In control observations, all dots in both RDSs were sharply defined. In experimental observations, one RDS contained only sharply defined dots, but the other contained differential spatial blur to introduce an additional depth cue. Results showed that the addition of differential blur made only a marginal difference to apparent depth separation, and only when the blur difference was consistent with the sign of disparity. Cue combination between blur and disparity cues is thus weighted very heavily in favour of the latter. It is shown that blur and disparity cues co-vary according to geometric optics. Since the two cues are effective over different distances, the visual system is not normally called upon to integrate them, and is most likely to make use of blur cues over distances beyond the range of disparity mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11115677     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00178-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.

Authors:  Pirmin Storz; Gerhard F Buess; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  How aquatic water-beetle larvae with small chambered eyes overcome challenges of hunting under water.

Authors:  Annette Stowasser; Elke K Buschbeck
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05

8.  Visual Attention and Applications in Multimedia Technologies.

Authors:  Patrick Le Callet; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 10.961

9.  Using Blur to Affect Perceived Distance and Size.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; James F O'Brien; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.414

10.  The (In)Effectiveness of Simulated Blur for Depth Perception in Naturalistic Images.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.