Literature DB >> 20725789

Prediction of long-term reverse left ventricular remodeling after revascularization or medical treatment in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: a comparative study between SPECT and MRI.

Tomas Skala1, Martin Hutyra, Jan Vaclavik, Milan Kaminek, David Horak, Josef Novotny, Jana Zapletalova, Jan Lukl, Dan Marek, Milos Taborsky.   

Abstract

Patients with ischemic heart disease and depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) develop varying degrees of LV remodeling after cardiac surgical revascularization. Fifty-three patients with stable ischemic heart disease and impaired LV function (LVEF 34.9 ± 4%) were prospectively followed up for 24 months. Thirty-seven patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 16 patients were treated conservatively. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and SPECT were performed at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. The patients were divided into responders and non-responders depending on the degree of LVEF improvement at 24 months follow-up (>5%-responders). MRI with ≤5 segments with DE/wall thickness ratio (DEWTR) ≥50% predicted LV reverse remodeling with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 75% (AUC 0.81). An MRI finding of ≤2 segments with the DEWTR ≥75% had a corresponding sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 67% (AUC 0.75) while fixed perfusion defect on SPECT <16.5% of LV predicted reverse remodeling with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 69% (AUC 0.64). A preoperative number of segments with the DE/wall thickness ratio of ≥50 and ≥75% obtained by MRI, was found to be a better predictor of left ventricular reverse remodeling than fixed perfusion defect by SPECT. No other MRI or SPECT parameter predicted LVEF improvement at 24 months after CABG. © Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20725789     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9677-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  39 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting (201)Tl SPECT. Single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Kakuya Kitagawa; Hajime Sakuma; Tadanori Hirano; Shinya Okamoto; Katsutoshi Makino; Kan Takeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Extensive left ventricular remodeling does not allow viable myocardium to improve in left ventricular ejection fraction after revascularization and is associated with worse long-term prognosis.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Arend F L Schinkel; Eric Boersma; Abdou Elhendy; Vittoria Rizzello; Alexander Maat; Jos R T C Roelandt; Ernst E van der Wall; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Myocardial viability on echocardiography predicts long-term survival after revascularization in patients with ischemic congestive heart failure.

Authors:  R Senior; S Kaul; A Lahiri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Functional outcome after revascularization in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: a quantitative late gadolinium enhancement CMR study evaluating transmural scar extent, wall thickness and periprocedural necrosis.

Authors:  Olga Bondarenko; Aernout M Beek; Robin Nijveldt; Gerald P McCann; Willem G van Dockum; Mark B M Hofman; Jos W R Twisk; Cees A Visser; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Nonstress delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of the myocardium predicts improvement of function after revascularization for chronic ischemic heart disease with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Paulo R Schvartzman; Monvadi B Srichai; Richard A Grimm; Nancy A Obuchowski; Donald F Hammer; Patrick M McCarthy; Jane M Kasper; Richard D White
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  [The importance of determining the viability of the myocardium prior to revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction].

Authors:  M Hutyra; T Skála; M Kamínek; D Horák; J Lukl
Journal:  Vnitr Lek       Date:  2008-04

8.  Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS).

Authors:  E L Alderman; L D Fisher; P Litwin; G C Kaiser; W O Myers; C Maynard; F Levine; M Schloss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance of late gadolinium enhancement and diastolic wall thickness to predict recovery of left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Rungroj Krittayaphong; Pansak Laksanabunsong; Adisak Maneesai; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Suthipol Udompunturak; Vithaya Chaithiraphan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Comparison of gated SPECT, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes.

Authors:  Hakan Demir; Yusuf Z Tan; Guliz Kozdag; Serkan Isgoren; Yonca Anik; Dilek Ural; Ali Demirci; Fatma Berk
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluation of mitral regurgitation prior to mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Neil K Mehta; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan Y Siden; Sara Rodriguez-Diego; Javid Alakbarli; Antonino Di Franco; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Prediction of mitral regurgitation resolution after coronary bypass graft surgery and cardiac resynchronization therapy by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging: a case report.

Authors:  Mai Azuma; Shingo Kato; Kazuki Fukui; Kouichi Tamura
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.