Literature DB >> 22684976

Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Eric M Pauli1, Steve J Schomisch, Joseph P Furlan, Andrea S Marks, Amitabh Chak, Richard H Lash, Jeffrey L Ponsky, Jeffrey M Marks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced esophageal dysplasia and early cancers have been treated traditionally with esophagectomy. Endoscopic esophageal mucosectomy (EEM) offers less-invasive therapy, but high-degree stricture formation limits its applicability. We hypothesized that placement of a biodegradable stent (BD-stent) immediately after circumferential EEM would prevent stricturing.
METHODS: Ten pigs (five unstented controls, five BD-stent) were utilized. Under anesthesia, a flexible endoscope with a band ligator and snare was used to incise the mucosa approximately 20 cm proximal to the lower esophageal sphincter. A 10-cm, circumferential, mucosal segment was dissected and excised by using snare electrocautery. In the stented group, an 18-×120-mm, self-expanding, woven polydioxanone stent (ELLA-CS, Hradec-Kralove) was deployed. Weekly esophagograms evaluated for percent reduction in esophageal diameter, stricture length, and proximal esophageal dilation. Animals were euthanized when the stricture exceeded 80% and were unable to gain weight (despite high-calorie liquid diet) or at 14 weeks.
RESULTS: The control group rapidly developed esophageal strictures; no animal survived beyond the third week of evaluation. At 2 weeks post-EEM, the BD-stent group had a significant reduction in esophageal diameter (77.7 vs. 26.6%, p < 0.001) and degree of proximal dilation (175 vs. 131%, p = 0.04) compared with controls. Survival in the BD-stent group was significantly longer than in the control group (9.2 vs. 2.4 weeks, p = 0.01). However, all BD-stent animals ultimately developed clinically significant strictures (range, 4-14 weeks). Comparison between the maximum reduction in esophageal diameter and stricture length (immediately before euthanasia) demonstrated no differences between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential EEM results in severe stricture formation and clinical deterioration within 3 weeks. BD-stent placement significantly delays the time of clinical deterioration from 2.4 to 9.2 weeks, but does not affect the maximum reduction in esophageal diameter or proximal esophageal dilatation. The timing of stricture formation in the BD-stent group correlated with the loss radial force and stent disintegration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684976      PMCID: PMC4562670          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2373-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiologic trends in esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Linda Morris Brown; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Kingo Hirasawa; Atsushi Kokawa; Hiroyuki Oka; Sei Yahara; Takeshi Sasaki; Akinori Nozawa; Katsuaki Tanaka
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  M Esaki; T Matsumoto; K Hirakawa; S Nakamura; J Umeno; H Koga; T Yao; M Iida
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms.

Authors:  S Ono; M Fujishiro; K Niimi; O Goto; S Kodashima; N Yamamichi; M Omata
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in the swine esophagus assisted by a cap attachment.

Authors:  Jan P Kamler; Richardo Borsatto; Kenneth F Binmoeller
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; Amnon Sonnenberg; Sebastian Strobel; Alexander Eckardt; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions.

Authors:  Chikatoshi Katada; Manabu Muto; Tetsuro Manabe; Narikazu Boku; Atsushi Ohtsu; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marjolein Sikkema; Pieter J F de Jonge; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ganapathy A Prasad; Tsung Teh Wu; Dennis A Wigle; Navtej S Buttar; Louis-Michel Wongkeesong; Kelly T Dunagan; Lori S Lutzke; Lynn S Borkenhagen; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Efficacy and safety of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures: the BEST (Biodegradable Esophageal Stent) study.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Frank P Vleggaar; Cesare Hassan; Petra G van Boeckel; Fabio Romeo; Nicola Pagano; Alberto Malesci; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sandro Contini; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Technical feasibility and tissue reaction after silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium stent insertion in the oesophagus: a primary study in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Zhu; Laura Edmonds; Li-Ming Wei; Rei-La Zheng; Ruo-Yu Cheng; Wen-Guo Cui; Ying-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A novel biodegradable esophageal stent: results from mechanical and animal experiments.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Liang Shang; Jiyong Liu; Chengyong Qin
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Commercially available biological mesh does not prevent stricture after esophageal mucosectomy.

Authors:  Steve J Schomisch; Liming Yu; Yuhsin Wu; Eric M Pauli; Cassandra Cipriano; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Preliminary results of antiscarring therapy in the prevention of postendoscopic esophageal mucosectomy strictures.

Authors:  Yuhsin Wu; Steve J Schomisch; Cassandra Cipriano; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Establishing a rabbit model of malignant esophagostenosis using the endoscopic implantation technique for studies on stent innovation.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Jinquan Shuang; Guanyin Xiong; Xiang Wang; Yin Zhang; Xiaowei Tang; Zhining Fan; Yingzhou Shen; Hanming Song; Zhi Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Prophylactic steroid administration for strictures after endoscopic resection of large superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kadota; Tomonori Yano; Tomoji Kato; Maomi Imajoh; Masaaki Noguchi; Hiroyuki Morimoto; Shozo Osera; Yusuke Yoda; Yasuhiro Oono; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Atsushi Ohtsu; Kazuhiro Kaneko
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-21

9.  A patient-like swine model of gastrointestinal fibrotic strictures for advancing therapeutics.

Authors:  Ling Li; Mohamad I Itani; Kevan J Salimian; Yue Li; Olaya Brewer Gutierrez; Haijie Hu; George Fayad; Jean A Donet; Min Kyung Joo; Laura M Ensign; Vivek Kumbhari; Florin M Selaru
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of endoscopic submucosal implantation vs. surgical intramuscular implantation of VX2 fragments for establishing a rabbit esophageal tumor model for mimicking human esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Yin Zhang; Hengao Zhong; Zhining Fan; Guobin Jiang; Yingzhou Shen; Hanming Song; Zhijian Tao; Kuangjing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.