Literature DB >> 33206288

Complement Coercion in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from a Self-paced Reading Study.

Wenting Xue1, Meichun Liu2.   

Abstract

The study aims to explore the processing pattern of Mandarin Chinese sentences with complement coercion. Complement coercion is a known linguistic phenomenon in which some verbs, semantically requiring an event-denoting complement, are combined with an entity-denoting complement, as in Mary began the book. The combination (i.e., event-selecting verb + entity-denoting noun) has been reported to involve type mismatch, and thus elicits processing difficulty. While the phenomenon has been extensively studied in Indo-European languages, such as English and German, it is debatable if the phenomenon exists in a typologically distinct language from English (e.g., in structural complexity of words), such as Mandarin. To provide empirical evidence, the study conducted a self-paced reading experiment to compare the processing patterns of coercion sentences and non-coercion controls in Mandarin. The results showed longer reading times for the coercion sentences than the non-coercion counterparts, which supported previous findings about the processing difficulty of complement coercion.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords:  Complement coercion; Mandarin Chinese; Self-paced reading; Semantic enrichment; Type mismatch

Year:  2020        PMID: 33206288     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09744-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  12 in total

1.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

Authors:  B McElree; M J Traxler; M J Pickering; R E Seely; R Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-01

2.  Semantic operations in aphasic comprehension: implications for the cortical organization of language.

Authors:  M M Piñango; E B Zurif
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  The effect of context on the processing of type-shifting verbs.

Authors:  Roberto G de Almeida
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The difficulty of coercion: a response to de Almeida.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Brian McElree; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Complement coercion is not modulated by competition: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Brian McElree
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Coercion and compositionality.

Authors:  Giosuè Baggio; Travis Choma; Michiel van Lambalgen; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  E Matthew Husband; Lisa A Kelly; David C Zhu
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Teasing apart coercion and surprisal: Evidence from eye-movements and ERPs.

Authors:  Francesca Delogu; Matthew W Crocker; Heiner Drenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-01-18

9.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Arim Choi; Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.