Literature DB >> 11061444

Reconstruction of major column defects and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

J B Stiehl1, R Saluja, T Diener.   

Abstract

Acetabular reconstruction with severe bone loss after failed total hip arthroplasty is a difficult problem. Defects were defined as major segmental and cavitary loss (type III anterior or posterior) or pelvic discontinuity (type IV). Seventeen cases were treated, of which 7 were type III and 10 were type IV. Bulk allograft was used in 16 of 17 cases, of which 7 were whole acetabular grafts, 2 were posterior segmental acetabular grafts, and 7 were femoral heads. Fourteen of 17 patients were female. The extensile triradiate approach was used in 12 cases. Long pelvic bone plates were applied to the posterior column and anterior brim of the pelvis in most cases. Allografts united to host-bone in 15 cases. Average follow-up was 83 months. The overall revision rate was 47%, of which 3 of 7 press-fit and 2 of 10 cemented cups had failed. The dislocation rate for the extensile approach was 50%; 2 patients had excisional arthroplasty for infection, and 2 patients had exploration of the sciatic nerve for release from migrating pelvic plate screws. Because of the overall poor results, this approach cannot be recommended for general use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11061444     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.9320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  18 in total

1.  Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.

Authors:  Michael J Taunton; Thomas K Fehring; Paul Edwards; Thomas Bernasek; Ginger E Holt; Michael J Christie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Mario Formagnana; Marco Bargagliotti; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  F Traina; F Giardina; M De Clerico; A Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 6.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?

Authors:  Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Erin L Ruh; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; John J Bottros; Jonah B Hulst; Vamsi K Kancherla; Mario Moric; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Cup-cage construct for massive acetabular defect in revision hip arthroplasty- A case series with medium to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dan Arvinte; Manish Kiran; Manoj Sood
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.