Literature DB >> 11061443

Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results.

M J Christie1, D K DeBoer, E M Tingstad, M Capps, M F Brinson, L W Trick.   

Abstract

A series of 163 revision total hip arthroplasties performed using a modular proximally porous-coated device was reviewed. Twenty patients died before achieving minimum follow-up, and 13 hips with Paprosky type IV femora were excluded. One patient was lost to follow-up. Minimum 4-year clinical data on the remaining 129 hips showed an improvement in modified Harris hip scores, from an average of 47.7 to 87.5. Spot welds at the sleeve-bone interface were found in 83 of the 102 hips with minimum radiographic follow-up. The aseptic failure rate was 2.9%; these hips showed progressive subsidence, with 1 resulting in the only repeat revision in the series. Three hips had osteolytic lesions of <5 mm; none threatened implant stability. There were no complications related to modularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11061443     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.9059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Hip implant revision. Avoiding mistakes and managing risk].

Authors:  R Volkmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular tapered stem.

Authors:  Christophe Pattyn; Alexander Mulliez; René Verdonk; Emmanuel Audenaert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Lothar Dueckelmann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

Authors:  Iker Uriarte; Jesús Moreta; Laura Cortés; Lucía Bernuy; Urko Aguirre; José Luis Martínez de Los Mozos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-15

6.  [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M D Schofer; T Efe; T J Heyse; N Timmesfeld; R Velte; F Hinrichs; J Schmitt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision hip prosthesis].

Authors:  A Schuh; U Holzwarth; G Zeiler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Extensively coated revision stems in proximally deficient femur: early results in 15 patients.

Authors:  S K S Marya; R Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.