Literature DB >> 19672577

[Hip implant revision. Avoiding mistakes and managing risk].

R Volkmann1.   

Abstract

Hip revision surgery may lead to unexpected complications, with a negative impact on the treatment outcome. To refer to possible difficulties as"mistakes" is less helpful than defining ways to foresee such difficulties and developing possible strategies to avoid them. This approach requires a comprehensive amount of personal experience, which may follow consideration of some basic"rules" and possible surgical scenarios before an intervention. The author presents an individual risk management approach that includes hints on how to foresee the occurrence of certain intraoperative difficulties and how to help avoid errors by incorporating forward-thinking strategies into hip revision surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672577     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1427-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  14 in total

1.  [Modular shafts in hip prosthesis revision surgery].

Authors:  H U Cameron
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR.

Authors:  D C Wirtz; K D Heller; U Holzwarth; C Siebert; R P Pitto; G Zeiler; B A Blencke; R Forst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Rudi G Bitsch; Maria Pritsch; Martin Clauss; Hans Mau; Steffen J Breusch
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  [Patient safety].

Authors:  M Rothmund
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  Revision surgery in high grade acetabular defects with thermodisinfected allografts.

Authors:  R Volkmann; K Bretschneider; E Erlekampf; S Weller
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.923

6.  [The German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations].

Authors:  D Bettin; B D Katthagen
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

7.  Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years.

Authors:  P Böhm; O Bischel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; D K DeBoer; E M Tingstad; M Capps; M F Brinson; L W Trick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Treatment of large femoral bone defects--15-year experiences with the cementless Bicontact revision stem with distal interlocking.

Authors:  B G Ochs; R Volkmann; C Eingartner; I Ludolph; S Weller; K Weise; U Ochs
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.923

10.  Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.

Authors:  Torsten Mumme; Ralf Müller-Rath; Stefan Andereya; Dieter Christian Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.