Literature DB >> 11057946

Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy.

R T Villavicencio1, D K Rex.   

Abstract

Cost-effective use of colonic imaging studies can be achieved through an understanding of the prevalence, incidence, growth, and miss rates of colon adenomas. High adenoma prevalence rates are associated with increasing age, male gender, and a family history of colorectal cancer or multiple first-degree relatives with colorectal neoplasia or neoplasia diagnosed at a young age. The incidence rate of advanced adenomas is higher in patients with multiple adenomas and is likely also associated with a family history of colorectal cancer, increased age, and large adenoma size at the index examination. Direct observational data on growth rates suggests that adenomas <1 cm in size have a fairly stable size over a 3-year interval. Although colonoscopy is the most sensitive colonic imaging study, substantial miss rates for small adenomas are inherent to the procedure. Advancements in endoscopic technology should lead to reduced miss rates, allowing expansion of intervals between examinations while reducing negative outcomes of fatal interval cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11057946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Gastrointest Dis        ISSN: 1049-5118


  15 in total

Review 1.  Virtual magnetic resonance colonography.

Authors:  J F Debatin; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Perspectives for preventive screening with total body MRI.

Authors:  Susanne C Ladd; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  MR colonography: current status.

Authors:  Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Kunio Kasugai; Naotaka Ogasawara; Makoto Sasaki
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-16

5.  Clinicopathological features of colon polyps from African-Americans.

Authors:  Mehdi Nouraie; Fatemeh Hosseinkhah; Hassan Brim; Behrouz Zamanifekri; Duane T Smoot; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is efficient: a controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  Markus Menges; Johannes Fischinger; Barbara Gärtner; Thomas Georg; Dietrich Woerdehoff; Matthias Maier; Matthias Harloff; Christa Stegmaier; Jochen Raedle; Martin Zeitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.

Authors:  Tuan A Dinh; Peter Alperin; Louise C Walter; Robert Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Colorectal polyps in the elderly: what should be done?

Authors:  Kenneth Miller; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology.

Authors:  W Ajaj; G Pelster; U Treichel; F M Vogt; J F Debatin; S G Ruehm; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Decreased histamine catabolism in the colonic mucosa of patients with colonic adenoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kuefner; Hubert G Schwelberger; Eckhart G Hahn; Martin Raithel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.