Literature DB >> 16770654

MR colonography: current status.

Thomas C Lauenstein1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) has gained access into clinical routine as a means for the assessment of the large bowel. There are widely accepted indications for MRC, especially in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Furthermore, virtual MRC is more and more propagated as a screening tool, with advantages especially inherent to the non-invasive character of this procedure and the lack of ionizing radiation exposition. Beyond a sufficiently high diagnostic accuracy, outstanding patient acceptance is a major advantage of MRC as a diagnostic modality. This review article describes indications, techniques and clinical outcome of current MRC approaches. Furthermore, the impact of fecal tagging concepts is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16770654     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0260-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  50 in total

1.  Complications of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jason A Dominitz; Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jay L Goldstein; William K Hirota; Brian C Jacobson; John F Johanson; Jonathan A Leighton; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Burcu Narin; Waleed Ajaj; Susanne Göhde; Jost Langhorst; Haldun Akgöz; Guido Gerken; Stefan G Rühm; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer; M J O'Brien; J D Waye; O Kronborg; J Bond; P Frühmorgen; L H Sobin; R Burt; A Zauber; B Morson
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Thomas C Lauenstein; Gregor Pelster; Gerald Holtmann; Stefan G Ruehm; Joerg F Debatin; Susanne C Goehde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?

Authors:  M Thomeer; D Bielen; D Vanbeckevoort; S Dymarkowski; A Gevers; P Rutgeerts; M Hiele; E Van Cutsem; G Marchal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.

Authors:  T C Lauenstein; C U Herborn; F M Vogt; S C Göhde; J F Debatin; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-09

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging based colonography for diagnosis and assessment of diverticulosis and diverticulitis.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Alois Fürst; Ayman Agha; Ron Kikinis; Karl Scheibl; Jürgen Schölmerich; Stefan Feuerbach; Hans Herfarth; Johannes Seitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  Utility of dark-lumen MR colonography for the assessment of extra-colonic organs.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Stefan G Ruehm; Susanne C Ladd; Guido Gerken; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance colonography in severe attacks of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  C Savoye-Collet; J B Roset; E Koning; C Charpentier; S Hommel; E Lerebours; J N Dacher; G Savoye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Imaging of the gastrointestinal tract-novel technologies.

Authors:  Jens Brøndum Frøkjaer; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Derivation of a T2-weighted MRI total colonic inflammation score (TCIS) for assessment of patients with severe acute inflammatory colitis-a preliminary study.

Authors:  Rehana Hafeez; Shonit Punwani; Doug Pendse; Paul Boulos; Stuart Bloom; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Michael Nuefer; Thomas Zoepf; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.