Literature DB >> 12746264

Virtual magnetic resonance colonography.

J F Debatin1, T C Lauenstein.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening has vast potential. Beyond considerations for cost and diagnostic accuracy, the effectiveness of any colorectal screening strategy will be dependent on the degree of patient acceptance. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography has been shown to be accurate regarding the detection of clinically relevant colonic polyps exceeding 10 mm in size, with reported sensitivity and specificity values exceeding 95%. To further increase patient acceptance, strategies for fecal tagging have recently been developed. By modulating the signal of fecal material to be identical to the signal characteristics of the enema applied to distend the colon, fecal tagging in conjunction with MR colonography obviates the need for bowel cleansing. The review will describe the techniques underlying MR colonography and describe early clinical experience with fecal tagging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746264      PMCID: PMC1867758          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.suppl_4.iv17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  32 in total

1.  Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M A Patak; J Froehlich; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-09-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.

Authors:  G Pappalardo; E Polettini; F M Frattaroli; E Casciani; C D'Orta; M D'Amato; G F Gualdi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases.

Authors:  K J Murphy; J A Brunberg; R H Cohan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Evaluation of Crohn's disease using half-fourier RARE and gadolinium-enhanced SGE sequences: initial results.

Authors:  H B Marcos; R C Semelka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders.

Authors:  W Luboldt; P Bauerfeind; P Steiner; M Fried; G P Krestin; J F Debatin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  H M Fenlon; D P Nunes; P C Schroy; M A Barish; P D Clarke; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.

Authors:  W Luboldt; P Bauerfeind; S Wildermuth; B Marincek; M Fried; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  [Diagnostic imaging of inflammatory and tumorous diseases of the colon].

Authors:  O Schaefer; T Baumann; M Treier; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Formation of transient complexes in the glutamate dehydrogenase catalyzed reaction.

Authors:  T Sanner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-11-18       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical application.

Authors:  Qing He; Ting Rao; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A G Schreyer; H C Rath; R Kikinis; M Völk; J Schölmerich; S Feuerbach; G Rogler; J Seitz; H Herfarth
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 73.082

8.  Frequency and nature of incidental extra-enteric lesions found on magnetic resonance enterography (MR-E) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Authors:  Hans H Herfarth; Michael Grunert; Frank Klebl; Ulrike Strauch; Stefan Feuerbach; Jürgen Schölmerich; Gerhard Rogler; Andreas G Schreyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  Sonia Rodriguez Gomez; Mario Pagés Llinas; Antoni Castells Garangou; Carmen De Juan Garcia; Josep M Bordas Alsina; Jordi Rimola Gibert; Juan R Ayuso Colella; Carmen Ayuso Colella
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.034

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.