Literature DB >> 11056133

Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories.

J Auger1, F Eustache, B Ducot, T Blandin, M Daudin, I Diaz, S E Matribi, B Gony, L Keskes, M Kolbezen, A Lamarte, J Lornage, N Nomal, G Pitaval, O Simon, I Virant-Klun, A Spira, P Jouannet.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess variability in the evaluation of human sperm concentration, motility and vitality. Technicians and biologists from 10 teams involved in multicentre studies on semen quality attended the same laboratory, each team using its own methods and equipment to analyse the same semen samples. Inter-individual variability was assessed from 17 fresh semen samples of varying quality. Intra-individual variability was assessed from pools of frozen samples for sperm concentration and motility and stained smears for vitality with three blind evaluations by sample and smear. The mean inter-individual coefficients of variation were 22.9, 21.8 and 17.5% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively. There was no statistical difference among participants for sperm concentration assessment, but significant differences for both motility and vitality (both P: < 0.05). The mean intra-individual coefficients of variation were 15.8, 26.2 and 13.1% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively, with marked differences between expert and novice participants: concentration 9.8% versus 28.0%; motility 22.8% versus 33.0%; and vitality 10.0% versus 19.3%. The present data confirm the need for external quality control schemes for diagnostic purposes, and indicate their utmost importance in multicentre studies on semen quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11056133     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.11.2360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  29 in total

1.  Status of semen analysis-comment on "A survey on the status of semen analysis in 118 laboratories in China" by Jin-Chun Lu et al. in Asian Journal of Andrology.

Authors:  Hugh William Gordon Baker
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  External quality control program for semen analysis: Spanish experience.

Authors:  C Alvarez; J A Castilla; J P Ramírez; F Vergara; A Yoldi; A Fernández; J J Gaforio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Semen analysis standardization: is there any problem in Polish laboratories?

Authors:  Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska; Katarzyna Marchlewska; Elzbieta Oszukowska; Eliza Filipiak; Leszek Bergier; Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage II: the effect of sperm concentration adjustment during processing.

Authors:  Eva Tvrdá; Francisca Arroyo; Michal Ďuračka; Carmen López-Fernández; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  High-magnification sperm selection does not decrease the aneuploidy rate in patients who are heterozygous for reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Mohamed Hassen Chelli; Fatma Ferfouri; Florence Boitrelle; Martine Albert; Denise Molina-Gomes; Jacqueline Selva; François Vialard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage I: the effect of seminal plasma-sperm co-incubation after ejaculation.

Authors:  Eva Tvrdá; Francisca Arroyo; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Sperm single-stranded DNA, detected by acridine orange staining, reduces fertilization and quality of ICSI-derived embryos.

Authors:  Irma Virant-Klun; Tomaz Tomazevic; Helena Meden-Vrtovec
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Sermondade; C Faure; L Fezeu; A G Shayeb; J P Bonde; T K Jensen; M Van Wely; J Cao; A C Martini; M Eskandar; J E Chavarro; S Koloszar; J M Twigt; C H Ramlau-Hansen; E Borges; F Lotti; R P M Steegers-Theunissen; B Zorn; A J Polotsky; S La Vignera; B Eskenazi; K Tremellen; E V Magnusdottir; I Fejes; S Hercberg; R Lévy; S Czernichow
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.

Authors:  J Lammers; C Splingart; P Barrière; M Jean; T Fréour
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Lack of trusted diagnostic tools for undetermined male infertility.

Authors:  Swati Pandruvada; Rachel Royfman; Tariq A Shah; Puneet Sindhwani; James M Dupree; Samantha Schon; Tomer Avidor-Reiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.