Literature DB >> 28469290

Ostracism Reduces Reliance on Poor Advice from Others during Decision Making.

Kaileigh A Byrne1, Thomas P Tibbett1, Lauren N Laserna1, Adrienne R Carter-Sowell1, Darrell A Worthy1.   

Abstract

Decision-making is rarely context-free, and often both social information and non-social information are weighed into one's decisions. Incorporating information into a decision can be influenced by previous experiences. Ostracism has extensive effects, including taxing cognitive resources and increasing social monitoring. In decision-making situations, individuals are often faced with both objective and social information and must choose which information to include or filter out. How will ostracism affect the reliance on objective and social information during decision-making? Participants (N=245) in Experiment 1 were randomly assigned to be included or ostracized in a standardized, group task. They then performed a dynamic decision-making task that involved the presentation of either non-social (i.e. biased reward feedback) or social (i.e., poor advice from a previous participant) misleading information. In Experiment 2, participants (N=105) completed either the ostracism non-social condition or social misleading information condition with explicit instructions stating that the advice given was from an individual who did not partake in the group task. Ostracized individuals relied more on non-social misleading information and performed worse than included individuals. However, ostracized individuals discounted misleading social information and outperformed included individuals. Results of Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1. Across two experiments, ostracized individuals were more critical of advice from others, both individuals who may have ostracized them and unrelated individuals. In other words, compared to included individuals, ostracized individuals underweighted advice from another individual, but overweighted non-social information during decision-making. We conclude that when deceptive objective information is present, ostracism results in disadvantageous decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advice; decision-making; ostracism

Year:  2015        PMID: 28469290      PMCID: PMC5410892          DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak        ISSN: 0894-3257


  21 in total

1.  Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance.

Authors:  Kipling D Williams; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-02

2.  Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem".

Authors:  Jon K Maner; C Nathan DeWall; Roy F Baumeister; Mark Schaller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

3.  Ostracism.

Authors:  Kipling D Williams
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis.

Authors:  Carel P van Schaik; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought.

Authors:  Roy F Baumeister; Jean M Twenge; Christopher K Nuss
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-10

6.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet.

Authors:  K D Williams; C K Cheung; W Choi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

7.  The Yale Interpersonal Stressor (YIPS): affective, physiological, and behavioral responses to a novel interpersonal rejection paradigm.

Authors:  L R Stroud; M Tanofsky-Kraff; D E Wilfley; P Salovey
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2000

8.  Experimentally induced social inclusion influences behavior on trust games.

Authors:  Hauke Hillebrandt; Catherine Sebastian; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.065

9.  Targeted Rejection Triggers Differential Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Gene Expression in Adolescents as a Function of Social Status.

Authors:  Michael L M Murphy; George M Slavich; Nicolas Rohleder; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01

10.  Learning in Noise: Dynamic Decision-Making in a Variable Environment.

Authors:  Todd M Gureckis; Bradley C Love
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.