Literature DB >> 11054329

Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes.

J C Javitt1, R F Steinert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Two million cataract extractions are performed annually in the United States. The procedure is nearly always accompanied by implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), which corrects the patient's distance vision. The authors' objective was to measure visual function and quality-of-life outcomes associated with bilateral implantation of a multifocal IOL, which corrects distance and near vision, and to compare the outcomes with those of the standard therapy.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial was conducted at eight sites in the United States, seven sites in Germany, and one site in Austria. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 245 cataract patients, 127 of whom received the multifocal IOL bilaterally and 118 of whom received a monofocal IOL of nearly identical construction bilaterally.
METHODS: Clinical data included visual acuity (VA), complications, and adverse events. Quality-of-life data were collected using a previously validated survey instrument at baseline, after first eye surgery, and after second eye surgery.
RESULTS: At 3 months after surgery, patients who had received multifocal IOLs had significantly better uncorrected and distance corrected binocular near VA compared with patients who had received monofocal IOLs (mean uncorrected VA, 20/26 multifocal vs. 20/40 monofocal; mean distance corrected VA, 20/28 multifocal vs. 20/45 monofocal; P < 0.0001). Additionally, 96% of patients who had received multifocal IOLs and 65% of patients who had received monofocal IOLs achieved both 20/40 and J3 (Jaeger) or better uncorrected, binocular distance and near visual acuities (P < 0. 0001). Patients who had received multifocal IOLs were more likely than patients who had received monofocal IOLs to never wear glasses overall (32% multifocal vs. 8% monofocal; P < 0.0001). On a 4-point scale, patients who had received multifocal IOLs on average reported having between "a little bit" and "some" glare or halo, whereas patients who had received monofocal IOLs reported between "none" and "a little bit" of glare or halo (1.57 vs. 0.43; P < 0.001). Patients who had received multifocal IOLs rated their vision without glasses better overall at near and at intermediate distances (P < or = 0.002) and demonstrated better visual function for near tasks and social activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Cataract patients who received multifocal IOLs at time of surgery obtained better uncorrected and distance corrected near VA and reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, less spectacle dependency, and more glare or halo than those who received traditional monofocal IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054329     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00368-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  52 in total

1.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in medical product development: a report from the 2009 NEI/FDA Clinical Trial Endpoints Symposium.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Elaine A Richman; Frederick L Ferris; Neil M Bressler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Premium intraocular lenses use in patients with cataract and concurrent glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  Raluca Iancu; Catalina Corbu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2013-09

3.  Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumitra S Khandelwal; Jason J Jun; Selene Mak; Marika Suttorp Booth; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Light-adjustable lens.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

6.  Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Marcelo V Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz A F Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Leonardo Akaishi; Rodrigo Vaz; Graziela Vilella; Rodrigo C Garcez; Patrick F Tzelikis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Intraocular lenses for the treatment of age-related cataracts: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-10-01

9.  Cost effectiveness of foldable multifocal intraocular lenses compared to foldable monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery.

Authors:  M G T Dolders; M D Nijkamp; R M M A Nuijts; B van den Borne; F Hendrikse; A Ament; W Groot
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  A contralateral eye study comparing apodized diffractive and full diffractive lenses: wavefront analysis and distance and near uncorrected visual acuity.

Authors:  Marcony Rodrigues de Santhiago; Marcelo Vieira Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz de Abreu Fiuza Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.