Literature DB >> 11050253

Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks.

A Gorea1, D Sagi.   

Abstract

Perceptual studies make a clear distinction between sensitivity and decision criterion. The former is taken to characterize the processing efficiency of the underlying sensory system and it increases with stimulus strength. The latter is regarded as the manifestation of a subjective operation whereby individuals decide on (as opposed to react reflexively to) the occurrence of an event based on factors such as expectation and payoff, in addition to its strength. To do so, individuals need to have some knowledge of the internal response distributions evoked by this event or its absence. In a natural, behaviorally relevant multistimulus environment, observers must handle many such independent distributions to optimize their decision criteria. Here we show that they cannot do so. Instead, while leaving sensitivity unchanged, lower and higher visibility events tend to be reported respectively less and more frequently than when they are presented in isolation. This behavior is in quantitative agreement with predictions based on the notion that observers represent a multistimulus environment as a unitary internal distribution to which each stimulus contributes proportionally to its probability of occurrence. Perceptual phenomena such as blindsight, hemineglect, and extinction may be, at least in part, accounted for in such a way.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050253      PMCID: PMC17350          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Blindsight and visual awareness.

Authors:  P Azzopardi; A Cowey
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-09

4.  Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; C Romani; A Olson; M J Riddoch; J Duncan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Brian Maniscalco; Tashina Graves; Elliott Huang; Floris P de Lange; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A detection theoretic explanation of blindsight suggests a link between conscious perception and metacognition.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ko; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time.

Authors:  Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-07-30

4.  Endogenous visuospatial attention increases visual awareness independent of visual discrimination sensitivity.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Shruti Japee; Savannah Lokey; Sara Ahmed; Valentinos Zachariou; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance.

Authors:  Shiau-Hua Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Trial-to-trial carryover in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Criterial noise effects on rule-based category learning: the impact of delayed feedback.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; A David Ing; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Carmel A Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual search and attention in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Associative cuing and sequential priming.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Alan B Bond; Marianna Burks; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.