Literature DB >> 19633342

Criterial noise effects on rule-based category learning: the impact of delayed feedback.

Shawn W Ell1, A David Ing, W Todd Maddox.   

Abstract

Variability in the representation of the decision criterion is assumed in many category-learning models, yet few studies have directly examined its impact. On each trial, criterial noise should result in drift in the criterion and will negatively impact categorization accuracy, particularly in rule-based categorization tasks, where learning depends on the maintenance and manipulation of decision criteria. In three experiments, we tested this hypothesis and examined the impact of working memory on slowing the drift rate. In Experiment 1, we examined the effect of drift by inserting a 5-sec delay between the categorization response and the delivery of corrective feedback, and working memory demand was manipulated by varying the number of decision criteria to be learned. Delayed feedback adversely affected performance, but only when working memory demand was high. In Experiment 2, we built on a classic finding in the absolute identification literature and demonstrated that distributing the criteria across multiple dimensions decreases the impact of drift during the delay. In Experiment 3, we confirmed that the effect of drift during the delay is moderated by working memory. These results provide important insights into the interplay between criterial noise and working memory, as well as providing important constraints for models of rule-based category learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633342      PMCID: PMC2730042          DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Kelli D Hejl; A David Ing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Perceptual learning without feedback in non-stationary contexts: data and model.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task.

Authors:  M H Herzog; M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Uncertainty experiments support the roles of second-order mechanisms in spatial frequency and orientation discriminations.

Authors:  J P Thomas; L A Olzak
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  10 in total

1.  Analogical transfer in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  Michael B Casale; Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  When bad stress goes good: increased threat reactivity predicts improved category learning performance.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; Brandon Cosley; Shannon K McCoy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

3.  The time course of explicit and implicit categorization.

Authors:  J David Smith; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Eric R Herberger; Joseph Boomer; Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Rule-based categorization deficits in focal basal ganglia lesion and Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; Andrea Weinstein; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Implicit learning mediates base rate acquisition in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  Corey J Bohil; Andrew J Wismer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

7.  Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Targeted training of the decision rule benefits rule-guided behavior in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  The effect of training methodology on knowledge representation in categorization.

Authors:  Sébastien Hélie; Farzin Shamloo; Shawn W Ell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Base-rate sensitivity through implicit learning.

Authors:  Andrew J Wismer; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.