Literature DB >> 22033721

High-resolution in utero 3D MR imaging of inner ear microstructures in fetal sheep.

J-H Buhk1, M Frisch, J Yamamura, J Graessner, G Adam, U Wedegärtner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Developmental inner ear abnormalities can occur due to embryopathies as well as in the context of syndromal diseases like the CHARGE association. In severe cases, an early and definite in utero diagnosis is important for decision-making; here, fetal MR imaging can be a helpful tool. We present results of performing high-resolution MR imaging of the inner ear structures of fetal sheep in vivo. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six ewes carrying singleton fetuses (mean gestational age, 120 days) were examined under general anesthesia at 1.5T. A 3D true FISP sequence with isotropic voxel size (0.7 mm) was applied; acquisition time was 2:35 minutes. For a standard of reference, 1 stillborn lamb of equivalent gestation age was examined. Image analysis was performed in consensus by 2 radiologists regarding the depiction of anatomic landmarks on a 5-point scale. Motion artifacts were quantified on a 3-point scale.
RESULTS: The turns and modiolus of the cochlea as well as the origins of all 3 semicircular canals of the vestibular system of both sides could be reliably identified in every animal. Motion artifacts due to maternal breathing excursions or movements of the fetus were minimal. In case of breech presentation, the ventilation of the ewe had to be paused during the image acquisition to achieve acceptable results.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution intrauterine MR imaging of the inner ear microstructures in an animal model is feasible. However, the acquisition time of the sequence applied is still too long to perform such measurement in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033721      PMCID: PMC7964387          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging.

Authors:  D Levine; P D Barnes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols.

Authors:  Daniela Prayer; Peter Christian Brugger; Lucas Prayer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-07-28

3.  Fetal sheep development on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: a standard for the in utero assessment of models of congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  Valerie L Ward; Judy A Estroff; Hiep T Nguyen; Yegappan Lakshmanan; Alison Hayward; Diego Jaramillo; David Zurakowski; Patricia S Dunning; Craig A Peters; Carol E Barnewolt
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: part 2.

Authors:  O A Glenn; J Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  High resolution MR imaging of the fetal heart with cardiac triggering: a feasibility study in the sheep fetus.

Authors:  Jin Yamamura; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Hendrik Kooijmann; Michael Frisch; Kurt Hecher; Gerhard Adam; Ulrike Wedegärtner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Denise Pugash; Martin Krssak; Vanessa Kulemann; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Brain stem and inner ear abnormalities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and cochlear nerve deficiency.

Authors:  B Y Huang; J P Roche; C A Buchman; M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  CT and MR imaging of congential abnormalities of the inner ear and internal auditory canal.

Authors:  J W Casselman; E F Offeciers; B De Foer; P Govaerts; R Kuhweide; T Somers
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis.

Authors:  Mary C Frates; Ada J Kumar; Carol B Benson; Valerie L Ward; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Fast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities.

Authors:  Deborah Levine; Patrick D Barnes; Richard R Robertson; Geoffrey Wong; Tejas S Mehta
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.