Literature DB >> 22763035

The use of in utero MRI to supplement ultrasound in the foetus at high risk of developmental brain or spine abnormality.

P D Griffiths1, M Porteous, G Mason, S Russell, J Morris, E M Fanou, M J Reeves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is widely accepted that the diagnosis of foetal central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities can be improved by performing MRI examinations in utero. Most of the published literature has concentrated on pregnancies in which a developmental abnormality has been detected (or suspected) on ultrasound in an otherwise low-risk pregnancy. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that in utero MRI of the foetal brain in high-risk pregnancies will detect abnormalities not shown by ultrasound at a rate that justifies its use in clinical practice.
METHODS: 100 females were recruited into the study from foeto-maternal or clinical genetic departments. They all had a foetus/child with a CNS malformation from an earlier pregnancy, which led to an increased risk of recurrence being quoted for the present pregnancy. All in utero MRI examinations were performed on 1.5 T clinical MRI systems at 18 weeks gestational age or later.
RESULTS: In 78% of cases, the ultrasound and MRI results agreed and showed no abnormality. In 13%, ultrasound and MRI described identical abnormal findings. In 9%, the ultrasound and MRI examinations had discrepant findings; in all these cases the MRI findings described more serious CNS pathology. The effects on management were judged to be major, by at least one assessor, in 7/9 of those cases.
CONCLUSION: As in many other situations involving antenatal detection of CNS abnormalities, in utero MRI should be considered in females with increased risk of foetal CNS malformation based on the results of an earlier pregnancy. Advances in knowledge In utero MRI of the foetus has an important role in antenatal diagnosis of females carrying a foetus with an increased risk of a brain abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763035      PMCID: PMC3500801          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/23696508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fetal imaging of central nervous system abnormalities.

Authors:  Anna M Golja; Judy A Estroff; Richard L Robertson
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M N J Paley; E H Whitby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 2-8       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis.

Authors:  D Levine; P D Barnes; J R Madsen; W Li; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero.

Authors:  E M Simon; R B Goldstein; F V Coakley; R A Filly; K C Broderick; T J Musci; A J Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  The significance of fetal ventriculomegaly: etiology, short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Gaglioti; Manuela Oberto; Tullia Todros
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  [Cerebral fetal MRI and ventriculomegaly].

Authors:  S Launay; Y Robert; A S Valat; D Thomas; L Devisme; N Rocourt; P Vaast
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2002-06

9.  Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities.

Authors:  E H Whitby; M N J Paley; A Sprigg; S Rutter; N P Davies; I D Wilkinson; P D Griffiths
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  A prospective study of fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly investigated by antenatal sonography and in utero MR imaging.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M J Reeves; J E Morris; G Mason; S A Russell; M N J Paley; E H Whitby
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.966

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pattern-based approach to fetal congenital cardiovascular anomalies using the transverse aortic arch view on prenatal cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Su-Zhen Dong; Ming Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23

2.  Analysis of supratentorial cystic abnormalities using in utero MR imaging.

Authors:  Hannah M Warner; Paul D Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study.

Authors:  L F Gonçalves; W Lee; S Mody; A Shetty; H Sangi-Haghpeykar; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Experience.

Authors:  Sepideh Sefidbakht; Sakineh Dehghani; Maryam Safari; Homeira Vafaei; Maryam Kasraeian
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 0.364

5.  Apert syndrome diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging and whole exome sequencing: A case report.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Fei-Xiang Huang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.