Literature DB >> 11034909

Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits.

J M King1, R B Nicklas.   

Abstract

When chromosomes attach properly to a mitotic spindle, their kinetochores generate force in opposite directions, creating tension. Tension is presumed to increase kinetochore microtubule number, but there has been no direct evidence this is true. We micromanipulated grasshopper spermatocyte chromosomes to test this assumption and found that tension does indeed affect the number of kinetochore microtubules. Releasing tension at kinetochores causes a drop to less than half the original number of kinetochore microtubules. Restoring tension onto these depleted kinetochores restores the microtubules to their original number. However, the effects of tension are limited. Prometaphase kinetochores, when under normal tension from mitotic forces, have about half as many microtubules as they will in late metaphase. We imposed a tension force of 6 x 10(-5) dynes, three times the normal tension, on prometaphase kinetochores. The elevated tension did not drive kinetochore microtubule number above normal prometaphase values. Tension probably increases the number of kinetochore microtubules by slowing their turnover rate. The limited effect of tension at prometaphase kinetochores suggests that they have fewer microtubule binding sites than at late metaphase. The relatively few sites available in prometaphase may be the decisive sites whose binding of microtubules regulates the dynamics of transient kinetochore constituents, including checkpoint components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034909     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.113.21.3815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  67 in total

1.  Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores.

Authors:  D B Hoffman; C G Pearson; T J Yen; B J Howell; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.

Authors:  D A Skoufias; P R Andreassen; F B Lacroix; L Wilson; R L Margolis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments.

Authors:  Susan L Kline-Smith; Alexey Khodjakov; Polla Hergert; Claire E Walczak
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M G Poirier; J F Marko
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 5.  Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly.

Authors:  Kami Ahmad; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mechanical impulses can control metaphase progression in a mammalian cell.

Authors:  Takeshi Itabashi; Yasuhiko Terada; Kenta Kuwana; Tetsuo Kan; Isao Shimoyama; Shin'ichi Ishiwata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Silva; J Barbosa; A V Nascimento; J Faria; R Reis; H Bousbaa
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 8.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  The mammalian kinetochore-microtubule interface: robust mechanics and computation with many microtubules.

Authors:  Alexandra F Long; Jonathan Kuhn; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; William G Waples; Brigitte D Lavoie; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.