Literature DB >> 12177448

Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly.

Kami Ahmad1, Steven Henikoff.   

Abstract

Histone variants have been known for 30 years, but their functions and the mechanism of their deposition are still largely unknown. Drosophila has three versions of histone H3. H3 packages the bulk genome, H3.3 marks active chromatin and may be essential for gene regulation, and Cid is the characteristic structural component of centromeric chromatin. We have characterized the properties of these histones by using a Drosophila cell-line system that allows precise analysis of both DNA replication and histone deposition. The deposition of H3 is restricted to replicating DNA. In striking contrast, H3.3 and Cid deposit throughout the cell cycle. Deposition of H3.3 occurs without any corresponding DNA replication. To confirm that the deposition of Cid is also replication-independent (RI), we examined centromere replication in cultured cells and neuroblasts. We found that centromeres replicate out of phase with heterochromatin and display replication patterns that may limit H3 deposition. This confirms that both variants undergo RI deposition, but at different locations in the nucleus. How variant histones accomplish RI deposition is unknown, and raises basic questions about the stability of nucleosomes, the machinery that accomplishes nucleosome assembly, and the functional organization of the nucleus. The different in vivo properties of H3, H3.3, and Cid set the stage for identifying the mechanisms by which they are differentially targeted. Here we suggest that local effects of "open" chromatin and broader effects of nuclear organization help to guide the two different H3 variants to their target sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12177448      PMCID: PMC139911          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172403699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

Review 1.  Domain organization at the centromere and neocentromere.

Authors:  K H Choo
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA.

Authors:  S Henikoff; K Ahmad; H S Malik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Heterochromatic deposition of centromeric histone H3-like proteins.

Authors:  S Henikoff; K Ahmad; J S Platero; B van Steensel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone.

Authors:  Harmit S Malik; Danielle Vermaak; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chromatin assembly factor I and Hir proteins contribute to building functional kinetochores in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Judith A Sharp; Alexa A Franco; Mary Ann Osley; Paul D Kaufman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Ctf3p, the Mis6 budding yeast homolog, interacts with Mcm22p and Mcm16p at the yeast outer kinetochore.

Authors:  Vivien Measday; Dale W Hailey; Isabelle Pot; Scott A Givan; Katherine M Hyland; Gerard Cagney; Stan Fields; Trisha N Davis; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Distinct protein interaction domains and protein spreading in a complex centromere.

Authors:  J F Partridge; B Borgstrøm; R C Allshire
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Specification of kinetochore-forming chromatin by the histone H3 variant CENP-A.

Authors:  A A Van Hooser; I I Ouspenski; H C Gregson; D A Starr; T J Yen; M L Goldberg; K Yokomori; W C Earnshaw; K F Sullivan; B R Brinkley
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans.

Authors:  William G Kelly; Christine E Schaner; Abby F Dernburg; Min-Ho Lee; Stuart K Kim; Anne M Villeneuve; Valerie Reinke
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Centromere identity in Drosophila is not determined in vivo by replication timing.

Authors:  B Sullivan; G Karpen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08-20       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  130 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal proteins in the spermatogenesis of Drosophila.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hennig
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Histone H3 Variants in Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  Zuzana Zubácová; Jitka Hostomská; Jan Tachezy
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2012-03-09

3.  Chromatin assembly factor 1 is essential and couples chromatin assembly to DNA replication in vivo.

Authors:  Maarten Hoek; Bruce Stillman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Chromatin dynamics and Arabidopsis development.

Authors:  Frédéric Berger; Valérie Gaudin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Histone H3 variants and modifications on transcribed genes.

Authors:  Jerry L Workman; Susan M Abmayr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Phosphorylation of histone H3 during transcriptional activation depends on promoter structure.

Authors:  Mariano Labrador; Victor G Corces
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  RNA interference, transposons, and the centromere.

Authors:  R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Histone mRNAs do not accumulate during S phase of either mitotic or endoreduplicative cycles in the chordate Oikopleura dioica.

Authors:  Mariacristina Chioda; Fabio Spada; Ragnhild Eskeland; Eric M Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  B cell-specific loss of histone 3 lysine 9 methylation in the V(H) locus depends on Pax5.

Authors:  Kristen Johnson; David L Pflugh; Duonan Yu; David G T Hesslein; Kuo-I Lin; Alfred L M Bothwell; Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko; David G Schatz; Kathryn Calame
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2004-07-18       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Intergenic transcription through a polycomb group response element counteracts silencing.

Authors:  Sabine Schmitt; Matthias Prestel; Renato Paro
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.