Literature DB >> 11033708

Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.

E E Hajcsar1, G Hawker, E R Bogoch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients who have undiagnosed osteoporosis and a recent fragility fracture present to fracture clinics in Canadian hospitals, where the focus of management is on fracture care. The rate of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in this patient group is unknown.
METHODS: Patients who presented with fractures at sites consistent with fragility-type fractures were identified through a retrospective chart review of fracture clinic visits in 3 Ontario community hospitals in selected weeks in February and November 1996 and August and May 1997. These patients were contacted by mail and telephone follow-up to obtain consent to participate in a telephone interview. Patients were excluded if the index fracture had been traumatic, if they were younger than 18 years, or if they had medical conditions known to be associated with secondary bone loss. Eligible patients were questioned about their history of prior fractures, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and investigation and treatment of osteoporosis before or after the index fracture.
RESULTS: Among 2694 fracture clinic visits, we identified 228 patients (8.4%) with fragility-type fractures. Of the 228, 128 (56.1%) were contacted and agreed to participate in an interview about 1 year from the date of the index fracture. Of the 128 patients, 108 (83 postmenopausal and 13 premenopausal women and 12 men) were confirmed as eligible. Of the 108, 43 had experienced 53 fractures in addition to the index fracture in the preceding 10 years, of which 71% were of the fragility type. At interview, only 20 (18.5%) (all postmenopausal women) of the 108 patients reported that they had received a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Of the 20, 90% and 45% respectively had been advised to take calcium and vitamin D supplements; 8 (40%) were receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and 8 (40%) were taking bisphosphonates. Of the 88 patients who had not received a diagnosis of osteoporosis, 4 (4.5%) were receiving HRT, none was taking bisphosphonates, and less than 20% had been advised to take supplemental calcium or vitamin D.
INTERPRETATION: In a representative sample of patients at urban fracture clinics, less than 20% who presented with a fragility-type fracture had undergone investigation and adequate treatment of osteoporosis at 1-year follow-up. Since previous fracture significantly increases the risk for future fracture, this clearly is a deficiency in management. Through improved identification and treatment of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures who present to fracture clinics, there is a significant opportunity to reduce the rates of illness and death associated with this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11033708      PMCID: PMC80503     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; J L Kelsey; M C Nevitt; K J O'Dowd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada.

Authors:  E A Papadimitropoulos; P C Coyte; R G Josse; C E Greenwood
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Consequences of a hip fracture: a prospective study over 1 year.

Authors:  I Sernbo; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures.

Authors:  S H Rose; L J Melton; B F Morrey; D M Ilstrup; B L Riggs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  70 in total

1.  Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture.

Authors:  Reza Sorbi; Mohamad Reza Aghamirsalim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Michel Fortier; Heather Frame; André Lalonde; Alexandra Papaioannou; Vyta Senikas; Chui Kin Yuen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-02

3.  Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Ramona Foster; Karim M Khan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Clinician's Commentary on Recknor et al.(1.).

Authors:  Judi Laprade
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  Gillian Hawker; Rowena Ridout; Maria Ricupero; Susan Jaglal; Earl Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England.

Authors:  D H Solomon; M T Connelly; C J Rosen; B Dawson-Hughes; D P Kiel; S L Greenspan; E S Leib; M Holick; A H Miguel; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact of subsidizing effective anti-osteoporosis drugs on compliance with management guidelines in patients following low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Yair Liel; Hana Castel; Dan Y Bonneh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  V Elliot-Gibson; E R Bogoch; S A Jamal; D E Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Austria between 1989 and 2010.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; H Resch; C Muschitz; H Thaler; M Szivak; K Amrein; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Community-based randomised controlled trial evaluating falls and osteoporosis risk management strategies.

Authors:  P M Ciaschini; S E Straus; L R Dolovich; R A Goeree; K M Leung; C R Woods; G M Zimmerman; S R Majumdar; S Spadafora; L A Fera; H N Lee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.