UNLABELLED: Only few studies have been published hitherto on country-specific incidence of distal forearm fracture. In the prevailing study, incidences were estimated, and trend analyses were performed for the entire Austrian population aged ≥50á. Incidence decreased significantly in women, but not in men, over the past 12 years of observation. INTRODUCTION: To estimate incidence of distal forearm fracture and assess incidence trends in the entire Austrian population aged ≥50á from 1989-2010 for inpatient fractures and from 1999 to 2010 for all fractures. METHODS: The number of inpatient forearm fractures was obtained from the Austrian Hospital Discharge Register (AHDR) for the entire population aged ≥50á from 1989 to 2010. Total number of distal forearm fractures was modeled using patient-level data on 36,327 patients with distal forearm fractures. Crude and age-standardized incidence rates (cases per 100,000) were estimated in 5-year age intervals. To analyze the change in incidence over time, average annual changes expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated. RESULTS: For all distal forearm fractures, age-standardized incidence in women in 1999 and 2009 were estimated at 709 (95 % CI 675-743) and 607 (578-637), respectively. The age-standardized incidences in men the same years were estimated at 171 (156-185) and 162 (151-174), respectively. IRR analyses showed a significant decrease in women (-1.1 %, p < 0.01) but not in men (-0.8 %, p > 0.05) over the last 12 years (1999-2010). CONCLUSION: Incidence of distal forearm fracture in the entire Austrian population is comparable to hip fracture incidence which is known to be among the highest worldwide. However, trend analyses reveal a significant decrease for all distal forearm fractures in women, but not in men, over the last 12 years.
UNLABELLED: Only few studies have been published hitherto on country-specific incidence of distal forearm fracture. In the prevailing study, incidences were estimated, and trend analyses were performed for the entire Austrian population aged ≥50á. Incidence decreased significantly in women, but not in men, over the past 12 years of observation. INTRODUCTION: To estimate incidence of distal forearm fracture and assess incidence trends in the entire Austrian population aged ≥50á from 1989-2010 for inpatient fractures and from 1999 to 2010 for all fractures. METHODS: The number of inpatient forearm fractures was obtained from the Austrian Hospital Discharge Register (AHDR) for the entire population aged ≥50á from 1989 to 2010. Total number of distal forearm fractures was modeled using patient-level data on 36,327 patients with distal forearm fractures. Crude and age-standardized incidence rates (cases per 100,000) were estimated in 5-year age intervals. To analyze the change in incidence over time, average annual changes expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated. RESULTS: For all distal forearm fractures, age-standardized incidence in women in 1999 and 2009 were estimated at 709 (95 % CI 675-743) and 607 (578-637), respectively. The age-standardized incidences in men the same years were estimated at 171 (156-185) and 162 (151-174), respectively. IRR analyses showed a significant decrease in women (-1.1 %, p < 0.01) but not in men (-0.8 %, p > 0.05) over the last 12 years (1999-2010). CONCLUSION: Incidence of distal forearm fracture in the entire Austrian population is comparable to hip fracture incidence which is known to be among the highest worldwide. However, trend analyses reveal a significant decrease for all distal forearm fractures in women, but not in men, over the last 12 years.
Authors: H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; M Chandran; F Borgström Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: T W O'Neill; C Cooper; J D Finn; M Lunt; D Purdie; D M Reid; R Rowe; A D Woolf; W A Wallace Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-10-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; H Thaler; M Szivak; K Amrein; F Borgström Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: F Borgström; I Lekander; M Ivergård; O Ström; A Svedbom; V Alekna; M L Bianchi; P Clark; M D Curiel; H P Dimai; M Jürisson; R Kallikorm; O Lesnyak; E McCloskey; E Nassonov; K M Sanders; S Silverman; M Tamulaitiene; T Thomas; A N A Tosteson; B Jönsson; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: C Muschitz; R Kocijan; A Baierl; R Dormann; X Feichtinger; J Haschka; M Szivak; G K Muschitz; J Schanda; P Pietschmann; H Resch; H P Dimai Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: A Svedbom; F Borgstöm; E Hernlund; O Ström; V Alekna; M L Bianchi; P Clark; M D Curiel; H P Dimai; M Jürisson; R Kallikorm; M Lember; O Lesnyak; E McCloskey; K M Sanders; S Silverman; A Solodovnikov; M Tamulaitiene; T Thomas; N Toroptsova; A Uusküla; A N A Tosteson; B Jönsson; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Teemu P Hevonkorpi; Antti P Launonen; Tuomas T Huttunen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Ville M Mattila Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: C Muschitz; M Hummer; J Grillari; A Hlava; A H Birner; M Hemetsberger; H P Dimai Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 4.507