Literature DB >> 7709929

Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies.

S R Cummings1, D Black.   

Abstract

Prospective studies have shown that bone mass, measured by any method and at any site, is inversely related to a woman's risk of fracture. Most types of fractures are more frequent in women with low bone mass. Bone mineral density measured in the proximal femur appears to have a stronger relationship to risk of hip fracture than bone density measured in other sites. On the other hand, measurement of bone mass in the spine does not appear to be substantially superior to measurements of bone mass in other sites. Even after age 80, bone mass measurements have a strong predictive value for most types of fracture. A woman's lifetime risk of hip fracture can be estimated from bone mass measurements made in the perimenopausal period. Although an individual's level of bone mass may vary from site to site, the incremental value of measuring bone mass in more than one site is not certain. Bone mass measurements, perhaps in combination with other risk factors for fracture, help define individuals with a high risk of fracture who stand to benefit most from efforts to prevent fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7709929     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(05)80041-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  44 in total

1.  Validation of the Cummings' risk score; how well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Luai A Ahmed; Henrik Schirmer; Vinjar Fønnebø; Ragnar M Joakimsen; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

Authors:  E S Siris; S K Brenneman; E Barrett-Connor; P D Miller; S Sajjan; M L Berger; Y-T Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Vertebral morphometry reference data by X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) in Iranian women.

Authors:  A Salimzadeh; M Moghaddassi; G H Alishiri; M B Owlia; L Kohan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Predictors of bone mineral density testing among older women on Medicare.

Authors:  Y Lou; S W Edmonds; M P Jones; F Ullrich; G L Wehby; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Femoral neck bone density and fracture risk.

Authors:  C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Determination of a standard site for the measurement of bone mineral density of the human calcaneus.

Authors:  B Burston; D S McNally; H D Nicholson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Epidemiological aspects of ageing.

Authors:  K T Khaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Rationale and clinical indications for bone density measurements.

Authors:  C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Design and methodology of the phase 3 trials for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Meunier; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.