Literature DB >> 9260036

An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development. Experience within Hoffmann La Roche.

B G Reigner1, P E Williams, I H Patel, J L Steimer, C Peck, P van Brummelen.   

Abstract

The integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles into drug development has been proposed as a way of making it more rational and efficient. The use of these principles in drug development to make scientific and strategic decisions is defined as the 'pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach to drug development'. The objectives of this survey were: (i) to assess the extent the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach to drug development has been used in a large multinational pharmaceutical company: (ii) to evaluate the impact of pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic results on clinical drug development; and (iii) to identify factors which prevented the full application of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach. This was done by looking at 18 projects in the current development portfolio at Hoffman La Roche and evaluating the use of this approach by interviewing the responsible clinical pharmacologist using a standardised questionnaire. (i) Benefits from using the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach were reported in every project, independent of development phase and therapeutic area. This approach was more extensively used in the recent projects. The selection of dosages in clinical studies was found to be the most important application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic results in terms of an impact on drug development. (ii) Time savings, up to several months, could be quantified in 8 projects during the entry-into-man studies and in 6 projects during the phase II or III studies. In 4 projects, 1 clinical study was avoided. (iii) The most important scientific factor preventing the full application of the approach was the lack of knowledge on the predictive value of the pharmacodynamic or surrogate marker for effect (6 projects). The results of the survey have shown that the use of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach has contributed to making clinical drug development more rational and more efficient. Opportunities to apply the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach should be identified in each project and a project specific strategy for the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach should be defined during phase 0 of drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9260036     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199733020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  4 in total

1.  Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicokinetics in rational drug development.

Authors:  C C Peck; W H Barr; L Z Benet; J Collins; R E Desjardins; D E Furst; J G Harter; G Levy; T Ludden; J H Rodman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  The use of kinetic-dynamic interactions in the evaluation of drugs.

Authors:  D B Campbell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  The target concentration approach to clinical drug development.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil.

Authors:  H J Lemmens; J B Dyck; S L Shafer; D R Stanski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.875

  4 in total
  29 in total

1.  Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis.

Authors:  S C Olson; H Bockbrader; R A Boyd; J Cook; J R Koup; R L Lalonde; P H Siedlik; J R Powell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Optimizing the science of drug development: opportunities for better candidate selection and accelerated evaluation in humans.

Authors:  L J Lesko; M Rowland; C C Peck; T F Blaschke
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development.

Authors:  R Gieschke; J L Steimer
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives.

Authors:  H Derendorf; B Meibohm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Prediction of hepatic metabolic clearance based on interspecies allometric scaling techniques and in vitro-in vivo correlations.

Authors:  T Lavé; P Coassolo; B Reigner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Applications of human pharmacokinetic prediction in first-in-human dose estimation.

Authors:  Peng Zou; Yanke Yu; Nan Zheng; Yongsheng Yang; Hayley J Paholak; Lawrence X Yu; Duxin Sun
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided trial design in oncology.

Authors:  Ch van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration in drug development and dosage-regimen optimization for veterinary medicine.

Authors:  Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Role of modelling and simulation: a European regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Anja Henningsson; Monica Edholm; Tomas Salmonson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.