Literature DB >> 11735674

Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

D A Hughes1, T Walley.   

Abstract

Faced with increasing demands on demonstrating cost effectiveness, pharmaceutical companies are required to conduct pharmacoeconomic evaluations throughout the drug development programme. At present, there is particular emphasis in the literature on burden-of-illness studies and on economic evaluations conducted alongside phase III clinical trials but not on those conducted during phase II clinical trials. This article describes modelling techniques, namely clinical trial simulations (CTS), which are gaining popularity in the clinical research community, but which might also prove to be beneficial during the conduct of these early pharmacoeconomic evaluations. The basic concepts and structure of CTS are described by using published examples of simulations of antipsychotic and anticancer drugs. With the use of an illustrative example of a hypothetical cholinesterase inhibitor for Alzheimer's disease, an integrated CTS-based pharmacoeconomic evaluation is presented. The results demonstrate how the modelling may be of value in 'go/no-go' decisions during the drug development programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735674     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  24 in total

Review 1.  Simulation of clinical trials.

Authors:  N H Holford; H C Kimko; J P Monteleone; C C Peck
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 2.  The dose-response relationship in phase I clinical trials and beyond: use, meaning, and assessment.

Authors:  G Emilien; W van Meurs; J M Maloteaux
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Strategic use of pharmacoeconomic research in early drug development and global pricing.

Authors:  K Clemens; L P Garrison; A Jones; F Macdonald
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Re-engineering drug development: integrating pharmacoeconomic research into the drug development process.

Authors:  J L Data; R J Willke; J R Barnes; P J DiRoma
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1995

5.  A forecasting approach to accelerate drug development.

Authors:  C A Hunt; S Guzy; D L Weiner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998 Aug 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling.

Authors:  B Meibohm; H Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 7.  Impact of genomics on drug discovery and clinical medicine.

Authors:  G Emilien; M Ponchon; C Caldas; O Isacson; J M Maloteaux
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2000-07

8.  Quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia. A high- and low-dose double-blind comparison with placebo. Seroquel Study Group.

Authors:  J G Small; S R Hirsch; L A Arvanitis; B G Miller; C G Link
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06

9.  Costs of formal care for frail older people in England: the resource implications study of the MRC cognitive function and ageing study (RIS MRC CFAS).

Authors:  P McNamee; B A Gregson; D Buck; C H Bamford; J Bond; K Wright
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  A Markov mixed effect regression model for drug compliance.

Authors:  P Girard; T F Blaschke; H Kastrissios; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  9 in total

1.  A role for two-stage pharmacoeconomic appraisal? Is there a role for interim approval of a drug for reimbursement based on modelling studies with subsequent full approval using phase III data?

Authors:  Suzanne Hill; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Role of pharmacoeconomic analysis in R&D decision making: when, where, how?

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Mechanism-based approach to the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic/pharmacoeconomic analysis of rituximab for follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Joshua Pink; Steven Lane; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Integrated Simulation Framework for Toxicity, Dose Intensity, Disease Progression, and Cost Effectiveness for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treatment With Eribulin.

Authors:  J G C van Hasselt; A Gupta; Z Hussein; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens; A D R Huitema
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vincent T Janmaat; Marco J Bruno; Suzanne Polinder; Sylvie Lorenzen; Florian Lordick; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Statistical Methods for Adjusting Estimates of Treatment Effectiveness for Patient Nonadherence in the Context of Time-to-Event Outcomes and Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review of Methodological Papers.

Authors:  Abualbishr Alshreef; Nicholas Latimer; Paul Tappenden; Ruth Wong; Dyfrig Hughes; James Fotheringham; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Innovation at the Intersection of Clinical Trials and Real-World Data Science to Advance Patient Care.

Authors:  Brandon Swift; Lokesh Jain; Craig White; Vasu Chandrasekaran; Aman Bhandari; Dyfrig A Hughes; Pravin R Jadhav
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Model-Based Biomarker Selection for Dose Individualization of Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Maddalena Centanni; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.