Literature DB >> 11027388

A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.

R B Kazemi1, E Stenman, L S Spångberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For a true comparison of clinically relevant qualities of instruments manufactured from different alloys, the instrument must be identical in design. The purpose of this study was to perform mechanical tests on stainless steel and nickel-titanium instruments of identical design. STUDY
DESIGN: Identical experimental endodontic files of H-type with double helix were fabricated from stainless steel and nickel-titanium alloys. Torsional and bending tests were carried out according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification No. 58 and International Standards Organization No. 3630/1. Changes in instruments during the testing were also analyzed with scanning electron microscope technique.
RESULTS: The results indicated that the torsional moment of the stainless steel files was significantly higher than for the nickel-titanium files (P <.001), whereas the mean angular deflection for the nickel-titanium files was significantly higher. The mean bending moment for the nickel-titanium files was significantly lower (P <.001) than the mean value for the stainless steel files. The scanning electron microscope demonstrated that the fracture surfaces of the stainless steel files were brittle, whereas the nickel-titanium files had a ductile fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: When the design of endodontic instruments of different alloys is identical, the nickel-titanium files are more flexible in bending. However, nickel-titanium files require less force to deform to fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027388     DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.108959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  8 in total

1.  Performance of NiTi endodontic instrument under different temperatures.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Yoshio Yahata; Arata Ebihara; Amre R Atmeh; Turki Bakhsh; Hideaki Suda
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals.

Authors:  Young-Sil Yoo; Yong-Bum Cho
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-11-21

3.  Flexibility and resistance to cyclic fatigue of endodontic instruments made with different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative test.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pongione; Giorgio Pompa; Valerio Milana; Stefano Di Carlo; Alessio Giansiracusa; Emanuele Nicolini; Francesca De Angelis
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-14

4.  Comparison of some physical properties of finger spreaders made of stainless steel or nickel-titanium alloys.

Authors:  Hélio P Lopes; Mônica A S Neves; Carlos N Elias; Edson J L Moreira; José F Siqueira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a comparative study.

Authors:  Eugenio Pedullà; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Alfio Pappalardo; Ernesto Rapisarda
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-08-09

6.  Evidence for reduced torsional resistance of rotary files under curved position.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Raghad Almedlej; Rasha Alomar; Nouf Almayouf; Abdulmohsen Alfadley; Khalid Alfouzan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-08-06

7.  An in vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal and GT series X files.

Authors:  Ramiro Montenegro-Santillán; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Vicente Faus-Matoses; Vicente Faus-Llácer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01

8.  [Not Available].

Authors:  L Testarelli; N M Grande; G Plotino; M Lendini; G Pongione; G De Paolis; F Rizzo; V Milana; G Gambarini
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-04-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.