Literature DB >> 15454473

Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata.

Padmavathy Rajagopalan1, William A Marganski, Xin Q Brown, Joyce Y Wong.   

Abstract

Native proteins are often substituted by short peptide sequences. These peptides can recapitulate key, but not all biofunctional properties of the native proteins. Here, we quantify the similarities and differences in spread area, contractile activity, and migration speed for balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- (FN) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-modified substrata of varying surface density. In both cases spread area has a biphasic dependence on surface ligand density (sigma) with a maximum at sigma approximately 200 molecules/microm2, whereas the total traction force increases and reaches a plateau as a function of sigma. In addition to these qualitative similarities, there are significant quantitative differences between fibroblasts adhered to FN and RGD. For example, fibroblasts on FN have a spread area that is on average greater by approximately 200 microm2 over a approximately 40-fold change in sigma. In addition, fibroblasts on FN exert approximately 3-5 times more total force, which reaches a maximum at a value of sigma approximately 5 times less than for cells adhered to RGD. The data also indicate that the differences in traction are not simply a function of the degree of spreading. In fact, fibroblasts on FN (sigma approximately 2000 microm(-2)) and RGD (sigma approximately 200 microm(-2)) have both similar spread area (approximately 600 microm2) and migration speed (approximately 11 microm/h), yet the total force production is five times higher on FN than RGD (approximately 0.05 dyn compared to approximately 0.01 dyn). Thus, the specific interactions between fibroblasts and FN molecules must inherently allow for higher traction force generation in comparison to the interactions between fibroblasts and RGD. Copyright 2004 Biophysical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454473      PMCID: PMC1304700          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.037218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  53 in total

Review 1.  A brief survey of methods for preparing protein conjugates with dyes, haptens, and cross-linking reagents.

Authors:  M Brinkley
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  Covalent surface immobilization of Arg-Gly-Asp- and Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg-containing peptides to obtain well-defined cell-adhesive substrates.

Authors:  S P Massia; J A Hubbell
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method.

Authors:  M Dembo; T Oliver; A Ishihara; K Jacobson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger; A F Horwitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Forces exerted by locomoting cells.

Authors:  T Oliver; J Lee; K Jacobson
Journal:  Semin Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06

6.  Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion.

Authors:  Y Xiao; G A Truskey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Tumor cell haptotaxis on immobilized N-acetylglucosamine gradients.

Authors:  B K Brandley; J H Shaper; R L Schnaar
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function.

Authors:  S Aota; M Nomizu; K M Yamada
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes.

Authors:  J Lee; M Leonard; T Oliver; A Ishihara; K Jacobson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation.

Authors:  S P Massia; J A Hubbell
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cell-material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials.

Authors:  Maurizio Ventre; Filippo Causa; Paolo A Netti
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Preparation of complaint matrices for quantifying cellular contraction.

Authors:  Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus; Patrick W Oakes; Jonathan Stricker; Stephen P Winter; Margaret L Gardel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Effect of substrate stiffness and PDGF on the behavior of vascular smooth muscle cells: implications for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Xin Q Brown; Erzsebet Bartolak-Suki; Corin Williams; Mathew L Walker; Valerie M Weaver; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Friction-controlled traction force in cell adhesion.

Authors:  Tilo Pompe; Martin Kaufmann; Maria Kasimir; Stephanie Johne; Stefan Glorius; Lars Renner; Manfred Bobeth; Wolfgang Pompe; Carsten Werner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Gradient biomaterials and their influences on cell migration.

Authors:  Jindan Wu; Zhengwei Mao; Huaping Tan; Lulu Han; Tanchen Ren; Changyou Gao
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates.

Authors:  Cynthia A Reinhart-King; Micah Dembo; Daniel A Hammer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jacot; Andrew D McCulloch; Jeffrey H Omens
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Dissecting the impact of matrix anchorage and elasticity in cell adhesion.

Authors:  Tilo Pompe; Stefan Glorius; Thomas Bischoff; Ina Uhlmann; Martin Kaufmann; Sebastian Brenner; Carsten Werner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness.

Authors:  Shang-You Tee; Jianping Fu; Christopher S Chen; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Cell response to RGD density in cross-linked artificial extracellular matrix protein films.

Authors:  Julie C Liu; David A Tirrell
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.