Literature DB >> 11023782

Substrate recognition and induced DNA deformation by transposase at the target-capture stage of Tn10 transposition.

P A Pribil1, D B Haniford.   

Abstract

The bacterial transposon Tn10 inserts preferentially into sites that conform to a 9 bp consensus sequence: 5' NGCTNAGCN 3'. However, this sequence is not on its own sufficient to confer target specificity as the base-pairs flanking this sequence also contribute significantly to target-site selection. We have performed a series of "contact-probing experiments" to define directly the protein-DNA interactions that govern target-site selection in the Tn10 system. The HisG1 hotspot for Tn10 insertion was the main focus here. We infer that there is a rather broad zone ( approximately 24 bp) of contact between transposase and target DNA in the target-capture complex. This includes base-specific contacts at all of the purine residues in the consensus positions of the target core and primarily backbone contacts out to 7-8 bp in the two flanking regions immediately adjacent to the core. Also, highly localized sites of chemical hypersensitivity are identified that reveal symmetrically disposed deformations in DNA structure in the target-capture complex. Furthermore, the level of strand transfer is shown to be reduced by phosphorothioate substitution of phosphate groups at or close to the sites of target DNA deformation. Interestingly, for one particular target DNA, a mutant form of HisG1 called MutF, the above phosphorothioate inhibition of strand transfer is suppressed by replacing Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Based on these results a model for sequence-specific target capture is proposed which attempts to define possible relationships between transposase interactions with the target core and flanking sequences, transposase-induced DNA deformation of the target site and divalent metal ion binding to the target-capture complex. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023782     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  Targeted transposition by the V(D)J recombinase.

Authors:  Gregory S Lee; Matthew B Neiditch; Richard R Sinden; David B Roth
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  DNA mismatches and GC-rich motifs target transposition by the RAG1/RAG2 transposase.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; Monalisa Chatterji; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  IHF-independent assembly of the Tn10 strand transfer transpososome: implications for inhibition of disintegration.

Authors:  Barry J Stewart; Simon J Wardle; David B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  A target specificity switch in IS911 transposition: the role of the OrfA protein.

Authors:  C Loot; C Turlan; P Rousseau; B Ton-Hoang; M Chandler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The global regulator H-NS acts directly on the transpososome to promote Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  Simon J Wardle; Michelle O'Carroll; Keith M Derbyshire; David B Haniford
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Target site selection by the mariner-like element, Mos1.

Authors:  Gwénaelle Crénès; Corinne Moundras; Marie-Véronique Demattei; Yves Bigot; Agnès Petit; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Structural basis for the activation and suppression of transposition during evolution of the RAG recombinase.

Authors:  Yuhang Zhang; Elizabeth Corbett; Shenping Wu; David G Schatz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  P instability factor: an active maize transposon system associated with the amplification of Tourist-like MITEs and a new superfamily of transposases.

Authors:  X Zhang; C Feschotte; Q Zhang; N Jiang; W B Eggleston; S R Wessler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Transposases are responsible for the target specificity of IS1397 and ISKpn1 for two different types of palindromic units (PUs).

Authors:  Caroline Wilde; Frédéric Escartin; Susumu Kokeguchi; Patricia Latour-Lambert; Aude Lectard; Jean-Marie Clément
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Congruence of in vivo and in vitro insertion patterns in hot E. coli gene targets of transposable element Mu: opposing roles of MuB in target capture and integration.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.