Literature DB >> 18556020

Congruence of in vivo and in vitro insertion patterns in hot E. coli gene targets of transposable element Mu: opposing roles of MuB in target capture and integration.

Jun Ge1, Rasika M Harshey.   

Abstract

Phage Mu transposes promiscuously, employing protein MuB for target capture. MuB forms stable filaments on A/T-rich DNA, and a correlation between preferred MuB binding and Mu integration has been observed. We have investigated the relationship between MuB-binding and Mu insertion into hot and cold Mu targets within the Escherichia coli genome. Although higher binding of MuB to select hot versus cold genes was seen in vivo, the hot genes had an average A/T content and were less preferred targets in vitro, whereas cold genes had higher A/T values and were more efficient targets in vitro. These data suggest that A/T-rich regions are unavailable for MuB binding, and that A/T content is not a good predictor of Mu behavior in vivo. Insertion patterns within two hot genes in vivo could be superimposed on those obtained in vitro in reactions employing purified MuA transposase and MuB, ruling out the contribution of a special DNA structure or additional host factors to the hot behavior of these genes. While A/T-rich DNA is a preferred target in vitro, a fragment made up exclusively of A/T was an extremely poor target. A continuous MuB filament assembled along the A/T region likely protects it against the action of MuA. Our results suggest that MuB binds E. coli DNA in an interspersed manner utilizing local A/T richness, and facilitates capture of these bound regions by the transpososome. Actual integration events are then directed to sites that are in proximity to MuB filaments but are themselves free of MuB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556020      PMCID: PMC2529481          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  33 in total

1.  Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence.

Authors:  J Bender; N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Microarray analysis of transposition targets in Escherichia coli: the impact of transcription.

Authors:  Dipankar Manna; Adam M Breier; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Two mutations of phage mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains.

Authors:  P C Leung; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Target site selection in transposition.

Authors:  N L Craig
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  Tn7: a target site-specific transposon.

Authors:  N L Craig
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein.

Authors:  K Adzuma; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-04-22       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  'Muprints' of the lac operon demonstrate physiological control over the randomness of in vivo transposition.

Authors:  X Wang; N P Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Target site selection in transposition of phage Mu.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1993

9.  Steady-state kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis by the B protein of bacteriophage mu. Involvement of protein oligomerization in the ATPase cycle.

Authors:  K Adzuma; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions.

Authors:  J Y Yang; K Kim; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

2.  Analysis of phage Mu DNA transposition by whole-genome Escherichia coli tiling arrays reveals a complex relationship to distribution of target selection protein B, transcription and chromosome architectural elements.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Zheng Lou; Hong Cui; Lei Shang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Deep sequencing reveals new roles for MuB in transposition immunity and target-capture, and redefines the insular Ter region of E. coli.

Authors:  David M Walker; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-07-09

4.  Immunity of replicating Mu to self-integration: a novel mechanism employing MuB protein.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Zheng Lou; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-02-01

5.  Genomic, proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of two temperate phages in Roseobacter clade bacteria isolated from the deep-sea water.

Authors:  Kai Tang; Dan Lin; Qiang Zheng; Keshao Liu; Yujie Yang; Yu Han; Nianzhi Jiao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli.

Authors:  Rudra P Saha; Zheng Lou; Luke Meng; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.