Literature DB >> 19629719

Target site selection by the mariner-like element, Mos1.

Gwénaelle Crénès1, Corinne Moundras, Marie-Véronique Demattei, Yves Bigot, Agnès Petit, Sylvaine Renault.   

Abstract

The eukaryotic transposon Mos1 is a class-II transposable element that moves using a "cut-and-paste" mechanism in which the transposase is the only protein factor required. The formation of the excision complex is well documented, but the integration step has so far received less investigation. Like all mariner-like elements, Mos1 was thought to integrate into a TA dinucleotide without displaying any other target selection preferences. We set out to synthesize what is currently known about Mos1 insertion sites, and to define the characteristics of Mos1 insertion sequences in vitro and in vivo. Statistical analysis can be used to identify the TA dinucleotides that are non-randomly targeted for transposon integration. In vitro, no specific feature determining target choice other than the requirement for a TA dinucleotide has been identified. In vivo, data were obtained from two previously reported integration hotspots: the bacterial cat gene and the Caenorhabditis elegans rDNA locus. Analysis of these insertion sites revealed a preference for TA dinucleotides that are included in TATA or TA x TA motifs, or located within AT-rich regions. Analysis of the physical properties of sequences obtained in vitro and in vivo do not help to explain Mos1 integration preferences, suggesting that other characteristics must be involved in Mos1 target choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629719     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-009-9387-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  37 in total

1.  cis and trans factors affecting Mos1 mariner evolution and transposition in vitro, and its potential for functional genomics.

Authors:  L R Tosi; S M Beverley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Substrate recognition and induced DNA deformation by transposase at the target-capture stage of Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  P A Pribil; D B Haniford
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Tn7 recognizes transposition target structures associated with DNA replication using the DNA-binding protein TnsE.

Authors:  J E Peters; N L Craig
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration.

Authors:  K J Maragathavally; J M Kaminski; C J Coates
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro.

Authors:  D J Lampe; M E Churchill; H M Robertson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Common physical properties of DNA affecting target site selection of sleeping beauty and other Tc1/mariner transposable elements.

Authors:  Thomas J Vigdal; Christopher D Kaufman; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Daniel F Voytas; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Insertion and excision of the transposable element mariner in Drosophila.

Authors:  G Bryan; D Garza; D Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Distribution of bending propensity in DNA sequences.

Authors:  A Gabrielian; A Simoncsits; S Pongor
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-09-09       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  A symmetrical six-base-pair target site sequence determines Tn10 insertion specificity.

Authors:  S M Halling; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Preferential transposition of Drosophila P elements to nearby chromosomal sites.

Authors:  J Tower; G H Karpen; N Craig; A C Spradling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Nanotechnology approaches for gene transfer.

Authors:  Karin E Lundin; Oscar E Simonson; Pedro M D Moreno; Eman M Zaghloul; Iulian I Oprea; Mathias G Svahn; C I Edvard Smith
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Target capture during Mos1 transposition.

Authors:  Aude Pflieger; Jerôme Jaillet; Agnès Petit; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Biochemical characterization and comparison of two closely related active mariner transposases.

Authors:  Maryia Trubitsyna; Elizabeth R Morris; David J Finnegan; Julia M Richardson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Natural stilbenoids isolated from grapevine exhibiting inhibitory effects against HIV-1 integrase and eukaryote MOS1 transposase in vitro activities.

Authors:  Aude Pflieger; Pierre Waffo Teguo; Yorgos Papastamoulis; Stéphane Chaignepain; Frederic Subra; Soundasse Munir; Olivier Delelis; Paul Lesbats; Christina Calmels; Marie-Line Andreola; Jean-Michel Merillon; Corinne Auge-Gouillou; Vincent Parissi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Use of mariner transposases for one-step delivery and integration of DNA in prokaryotes and eukaryotes by transfection.

Authors:  Maryia Trubitsyna; Gracjan Michlewski; David J Finnegan; Alistair Elfick; Susan J Rosser; Julia M Richardson; Christopher E French
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Nested plant LTR retrotransposons target specific regions of other elements, while all LTR retrotransposons often target palindromes and nucleosome-occupied regions: in silico study.

Authors:  Pavel Jedlicka; Matej Lexa; Ivan Vanat; Roman Hobza; Eduard Kejnovsky
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2019-12-14

7.  Regulation of mariner transposition: the peculiar case of Mos1.

Authors:  Jérôme Jaillet; Murielle Genty; Jeanne Cambefort; Jacques-Deric Rouault; Corinne Augé-Gouillou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hsmar1 transposition is sensitive to the topology of the transposon donor and the target.

Authors:  Corentin Claeys Bouuaert; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Repeat elements organise 3D genome structure and mediate transcription in the filamentous fungus Epichloë festucae.

Authors:  David J Winter; Austen R D Ganley; Carolyn A Young; Ivan Liachko; Christopher L Schardl; Pierre-Yves Dupont; Daniel Berry; Arvina Ram; Barry Scott; Murray P Cox
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.